StuttgartDHH
2016-10-03 12:33:49
- #1
I don't understand what could be wrong with SAT-IP and why people insist on needing a receiver for it.
Our TVs (from 2011 and 2012) both have a so-called DLNA client built in. With that, you can stream content from DLNA servers (Fritzbox, NAS systems, PCs, etc.). We have now bought a SAT-IP server from Triax (TSS 400) and the Amazon reviews are divided even there, but what I want to get at is this:
It distributes the signal via DLNA, so any DLNA client can play it back – including our TVs. Smartphones, tablets, Blu-ray players, PS3, ... can usually do that anyway. Of course, you can still connect a corresponding receiver in between, but why?
If I want to record something, I use a dedicated computer, or in my case the already existing Synology NAS with the free TVHeadend software, and then I can record all sorts of things (also timer-controlled).
Our dish is not coming until this Wednesday, but the Triax is already here. I can report my experiences over the weekend.
Our TVs (from 2011 and 2012) both have a so-called DLNA client built in. With that, you can stream content from DLNA servers (Fritzbox, NAS systems, PCs, etc.). We have now bought a SAT-IP server from Triax (TSS 400) and the Amazon reviews are divided even there, but what I want to get at is this:
It distributes the signal via DLNA, so any DLNA client can play it back – including our TVs. Smartphones, tablets, Blu-ray players, PS3, ... can usually do that anyway. Of course, you can still connect a corresponding receiver in between, but why?
If I want to record something, I use a dedicated computer, or in my case the already existing Synology NAS with the free TVHeadend software, and then I can record all sorts of things (also timer-controlled).
Our dish is not coming until this Wednesday, but the Triax is already here. I can report my experiences over the weekend.