House wiring LAN/SAT

  • Erstellt am 2016-08-25 08:44:01

StuttgartDHH

2016-10-03 12:33:49
  • #1
I don't understand what could be wrong with SAT-IP and why people insist on needing a receiver for it.
Our TVs (from 2011 and 2012) both have a so-called DLNA client built in. With that, you can stream content from DLNA servers (Fritzbox, NAS systems, PCs, etc.). We have now bought a SAT-IP server from Triax (TSS 400) and the Amazon reviews are divided even there, but what I want to get at is this:
It distributes the signal via DLNA, so any DLNA client can play it back – including our TVs. Smartphones, tablets, Blu-ray players, PS3, ... can usually do that anyway. Of course, you can still connect a corresponding receiver in between, but why?
If I want to record something, I use a dedicated computer, or in my case the already existing Synology NAS with the free TVHeadend software, and then I can record all sorts of things (also timer-controlled).
Our dish is not coming until this Wednesday, but the Triax is already here. I can report my experiences over the weekend.
 

Grym

2016-10-03 12:45:39
  • #2
I have read, Sky does not work at all with Sat-IP!?
 

Alex85

2016-10-03 12:58:16
  • #3
DLNA is more of a makeshift solution. Yes, with a DLNA client you can transmit video and audio, if the SatIP server has also implemented DLNA. Everything that comes after that is luck or even definitely doesn’t work. Forget channel lists, fast zapping, EPG, possibly subtitles, audio selection ...

Encrypted signals are not a problem. The receiver obviously needs CI+ or something similar. What does not work is central decryption on the server.
 

StuttgartDHH

2016-10-03 13:03:40
  • #4
The thing with EPG, etc. is of course true. I am placing my hopes on TVHeadend, which at least can handle EPG. I don't know about subtitles, but I haven't had them in nearly 30 years of cable TV so far and therefore haven't missed them.
 

Egon12

2016-10-04 14:24:03
  • #5
I have LAN in every room and Coax in every room (a total of 7), excluding only the bathrooms and utility room. For the living room, I got myself a 5-port switch, somehow technology hardly works unplugged these days...

I can't recommend WiFi without a repeater in the new building, our impact sound insulation could just as well be a tin foil hat...

Much more annoying than the wiring is the castration of HD+ by the private channels... What am I supposed to do with timeshift if I can only rewind but not fast forward? For me, the SD channels are back in the favorites. By now, practically every receiver with 2 tuners can record and send with just one cable. (Even the Sat 500 box from T Com)
 

DNL

2016-10-04 21:26:10
  • #6
Please plan Access Points instead of repeaters.
 

Similar topics
18.10.2013SAT and/or cable?12
12.12.2015Antenna connection forgotten (SAT system)26
17.01.2021Installation of a satellite system38
02.06.2016Sat multiswitch in the attic or basement?22
02.06.2016Conduit Costs - Network, SAT, Backup14
09.06.2016SAT flush-mounted box: Modem does not work. Frequency filter?11
03.07.2016Satellite system on a 5° pitched roof12
11.08.2016SAT dish, rafter holder in self-made work10
05.04.2017LAN / SAT wiring in single-family house52
09.06.2017What is a realistic price for a SAT system including installation?45
30.05.2017Preparation for SAT10
07.08.2017Cost of satellite system including installation?11
28.04.2024Potential equalization for satellite must be laid separately17
08.05.2019SAT system in new construction: Unicable or star wiring?41
29.02.2020Implement LAN and SAT in a single-family house with a central server cabinet40
25.08.2020Is a satellite system still necessary in new buildings, or is IPTV sufficient?233
17.11.2019Satellite system - buying guide and installation41
03.06.2020TV / SAT-TV / Over the network or distributor and via cable in the new building?14
08.04.2021Building without antenna and SAT-CAT cable without conduit?65
26.01.2021Reasonably changing existing SAT/cable connection botch work27

Oben