House purchase: Sale before the expiry of 10 years - Right of first refusal

  • Erstellt am 2020-02-12 00:06:32

nordanney

2020-02-14 08:40:14
  • #1

The seller always remains the owner. The bank does not get the house. At most, coercive measures are initiated. A lot of time passes before it is actually sold/auctioned.
And until then, the seller can still sell freely as he sees fit – or rent it out and pay the installments, then nothing happens at all.
 

Hauskauf 2020

2020-02-14 13:10:59
  • #2


That's exactly what I think too, besides it's risky to speculate on it.. you never know what will come


As already mentioned, insolvency has not occurred yet.. that would possibly be the consequence if he has to pay for several more months and has no further income from renting or similar.
However, that is not an option either, because his new partner does not want to live in that town, so they want to move away.

The acquaintance is actually not that close, it is a colleague of my brother.
No family or anything - just "good" friends..
 

Hauskauf 2020

2020-02-14 13:12:28
  • #3
That's exactly how it looks, we do not want to speculate on that.
 

Hauskauf 2020

2020-02-14 13:16:57
  • #4


Yes, that is a bit confusing for me too, because the bank does not yet have a contract on which to base the decision. As far as I know, the municipality must issue a negative certificate within 2 months after the notary has certified. Then they also have the purchase contract on hand.

I hope this preliminary decision of the municipality is binding..
 

Nordlys

2020-02-14 13:18:19
  • #5
....and how does one know that the price notarized by the notary is actually the one that is paid in reality?
 

Scout

2020-02-14 13:31:00
  • #6
so much babble, sorry. The exercise of the right of first refusal was nowhere mentioned by the original poster.

Now let's get to the point: if the municipality wanted the money, how much would that be? And would you still buy the house or the seller still want to sell? If yes, consider how you want to

a) handle it with money for the municipality
b) handle it without money for the municipality

and have that included as an option in the contract.

If no, then have the notary contract drawn up on the condition that the municipality wants nothing.

Whether they want something can only be told to you by the municipal council, but certainly nobody here in the forum.
 

Similar topics
16.06.2011Conclude a construction contract under reservation?10
13.09.2012Feeling pressured into a contract, is that normal?17
29.09.2011Is construction pre-planning without signature / contract legally valid?12
22.09.2012Who else fell for a contract with a reservation clause? - Search13
16.05.2015Contract unclear: humus earth collectors10
16.06.2015Land purchase: Questions about the notary24
23.08.2015Construction financing with a fixed-term contract13
04.07.2016Building without a contract - Concerns?39
10.09.2016Construction financing and contract with the developer24
28.09.2016Question about early repayment and clause in the contract41
12.04.2017Garage price in the purchase contract from the notary is lower18
28.05.2017Plundering the Riester contract - for less need for credit?16
20.03.2018Land contract notarized unilaterally by the notary - Change the notary?16
16.08.2018Civil engineering works without a contract - normal, experiences?10
04.01.2022Architect, contract according to HOAI 2013 - refuses to provide service36
02.06.2020Notary contract amendment of the right of way10
05.08.2020Contract for land purchase - obligation to build within 2.5 years18
30.03.2022Terminate the contract with the general contractor "early"22

Oben