Floor plan: who has the master bedroom on the ground floor?

How does the budget look?

One person simply values a living landscape, another needs an oversized kitchen to live out their passion.

I find it absolutely important that one sees their very own needs and wishes reflected in the floor plan. In the forum, everyone should then assess this from their perspective or, if possible, from that of the future user, as far as he or she also explains themselves in detail here. It becomes difficult or even pointless whenever someone stubbornly defends "their" design, although it is actually the architect’s. I recall during my own build a critic who advised me to relocate the kitchen and dining room to the upper floor because of the view. That would certainly have been unusual, yet I thought it through for us, even though in the end I did it differently. Unfortunately, the OP does not respond to all critiques, because I would have actually liked to understand why, for example, the living room is conspicuously small compared to the generous hallway areas mentioned by , especially in regard to the size of other rooms. Of course, everyone may build what they want or what the building authority allows, but for me, that is a "conspicuous feature," and if the community is to participate in the discussion here, their comments must also be addressed. I even particularly like very extravagant designs, but I also like to understand why this or that is the way it is.

Hello everyone,

Quickly, as I'm about to leave: The budget is 600k excluding the land and outdoor facilities. That should be enough for us, I think.

We deliberately kept the living room relatively small because we currently spend very little time there. Our focus in the current rental house (built in 1960) is the kitchen with the dining area/bench corner; this is where our daily life takes place.

We might be in the living room maybe Sunday evening for the Tatort – not more often. It only needs to fit a couch and the TV for us.

Why not already include in the planning of the house or on the house a possible elevator through all floors and choose a wheelchair-accessible "standard layout" for it.

Well, I question, when you read it like this:

This wish stems from the fact that I am somewhat physically compromised and especially find climbing stairs not always easy (balance etc.).

..whether it should be a "standard layout" or rather a standard bungalow with stairs and a low-pitched roof, so that the desired children's room and a hobby-multipurpose room (alternating with a bedroom for new parents) can still be accommodated in the attic. The ground floor then autonomous without a basement, which one cannot frequent five times a day to get cleaning supplies and drinks. I am currently reading:

The budget is 600k without land and outdoor facilities. That should be enough for us, I think.

I don't think so. The house is about 180, 190 sqm. Including projections and dormers, that's already more than 600,000€. Then the double garage, basement and incidental building costs . .

In the living room, we might be there maybe Sunday evening for Tatort – not more often. Only a couch and the TV have to fit in there for us.

At seventeen, you still have dreams (the dear little ones would only distribute their building blocks in the children's rooms).

In the living room we might be there on a Sunday evening for the Tatort – not often. Only a couch and the TV need to fit in there for us.

.. That's why it also gets the brightest spot in the house ..