Floor plan - plot for a single-family house, slight slope approx. 175m²

I really can’t imagine that right now. Entrance on the ground floor on the north side means no terrace on the ground floor, right?

That’s what I have determined, yes.

BUT: Your terrace will then be more or less on the upper floor. And your light wells very deep

Are you sure it works that easily? Isn't the "main street" taken as a reference or the average height that borders your property? And does the eaves height really only apply to the street to which the eaves are oriented?

Here is the excerpt from the development plan regarding the reference points.

For corner plots, in my opinion, no complete definition. Is one allowed to choose the street that one selects as a reference point? I would quite cheekily just say yes and push for the maximum height.

In my opinion, there is no complete definition for corner plots. Are you allowed to choose the street you select as a reference point? I would quite cheekily just say yes and go for the maximum height.

That was my assumption. The maximum height is not the problem, rather the knee wall height.

Hello,

I cannot quite understand the suggestions of the previous posters. In my opinion, with the available budget for the entire project, it is not possible to realize two floors plus a basement. The basement is an unnecessary cost driver.

With this plot, one can work well with the slope and still implement a typically Franconian architecture wonderfully on two floors:

[*]Garage in the east, 4 m x max. 9 m
[*]Elongated main building body attached to the garage and reaching to the building boundary to the north, max. 8 m x approx. 14 - 15 m
[*]Ridge direction north-south

Ground floor at the level of the existing terrain of the northern access road

[*]Entrance and guest WC in the northeast
[*]Landing staircase, 180 degrees on the east wall, lighting through a floor-to-ceiling fixed glazing on the east wall in the upper floor
[*]Office/guest room in the northwest corner of the building
[*]Two children's rooms in the west
[*]Children's bathroom between the children's rooms
[*]Technical room and utility room in the southeast (with light shaft to the east behind the garage, no light trench), access to the garage possible
[*]Children’s terrace in the west

Upper floor at the height level of the southern property boundary (+2.86 m)

[*]Bedroom in the northeast
[*]Dressing room and bathroom in the north/northwest
[*]Living, dining, kitchen in the west and south
[*]Terrace in the south/southwest

Converted attic

[*]Additional office(s) depending on roof pitch, without knee wall at a roof pitch around 40 degrees
[*]Dormer window with maximum length (1/3 of the ridge length) to the west, flat to emphasize the elongated building body

The height difference between the upper terrace and the children’s terrace is overcome at the southwest corner of the house, e.g., as stepped planting terraces with stairs. Roof without overhangs, southern facade generously glazed (possibly also around the corner to the west), on the north side the upper floor and the gable perhaps as a wooden slat facade. The ground floor could also set back one meter on the north side to create a covered entrance situation.

Advantages from my point of view:

[*]The most beautiful side of the plot is the west. To the next house it is at least 13.5 m there with the above building body. To the south, the neighbor will move as far north as possible and thus "wall in" the garden
[*]The garage roof can be used as a green area if needed
[*]Cost savings through ground-floor living instead of basement; costs for excavation and terrain modeling should be identical to those of a half-buried basement
[*]Living on two levels
[*]Two level terrace areas

Best regards