K a t j a
2023-02-17 22:55:38
- #1
Well, as already mentioned, this is really a split-level property for me. The reason is mainly the small size. The staircase with the entrance platform would be my second option. Dietmar’s sketch may look nice, but it does not show reality. He should please draw the street as well! Then it quickly becomes clear that the entire property would have to be retained on the street side. Apart from the fact that this is very expensive, it would also create more or less a kind of "concrete crypt."What would you have advised us, , if we were still "free"?
Why split? On larger plots, you can often gently compensate and taper off half-level height differences in the building envelope by land modeling. But if there are only 3m up to the boundary, no gentleness is possible. Then a wall must go in. Maybe someone else has a better idea. The pros at Bien-Zenker should advise you! If they even have a special "slope department" – perfect! Let them show what’s possible.
Two things that I think should generally be said about this: 1. Anyone who buys a hillside property (and this is one) should not expect to get by without stairs. That would be quite unrealistic. The question also remains how steep the slope in the building envelope actually is in the end. We are only estimating here based on your contour lines. 2. Draw a side view of your property on graph paper with the slope to the millimeter. Then take a rectangle with the base dimensions of your house and lay it on top. You definitely need to get a feel for your land. In particular, the location of the terrace must be fixed in the end, preferably without water collecting there later or you having to jump down 1m from your terrace doors (all of which has happened before).