EH 790K€, financing 480K€ - feasible with our monthly budget?

  • Erstellt am 2023-02-15 02:55:05

Grundaus

2023-02-16 09:56:45
  • #1
leave out the storage, it is rarely worth it. The size of the solar system can be influenced by roof orientation, dormers, angle
 

WilderSueden

2023-02-16 10:07:37
  • #2
Now you are the one who is totally out of touch. 8k net is more than double the average. There may be people who, with that income, settle for the Town & Country standard, painting themselves and laying floors. That is absolutely not the norm. If someone wants to have their calculation questioned, that must also be taken into account. In the end, the OP can decide for themselves whether their building description matches their wishes. They should only be aware that 3000€/sqm is not as generous as it seems. Especially with the current construction costs.
 

xMisterDx

2023-02-16 10:56:14
  • #3
I believe the winner in terms of craziness has long been determined?
Whoever calls a KfW40+ house "a relatively normal standard, not luxury" has basically qualified for it uncontested...

As I said. 8,000 EUR net today is 6,000 EUR net in 2019.
House prices in 3 years up by a good 30-40% and the monthly installments have more than doubled due to the high interest rates.

You can try calculating whether you could still finance your house today. I definitely couldn’t anymore. And in good years, we are also beyond 6,000 EUR net due to my external work...

PS:
Or rather, I could still finance it, but would have to give up so much that it wouldn’t be worth it anymore. Then you only live for this box...
PPS:
Because do you think someone who earns 8,000 EUR net wants to end up with no money left for vacation... or for the children’s riding lessons? ;)
 

WilderSueden

2023-02-16 11:21:38
  • #4
I did not say relatively normal: But it is definitely not luxury class. Proper building technology was more important to us than any large-format tiles, smart home, air spaces, lift-and-slide doors, or the oak staircase. I probably would not have taken some parts (e.g. geothermal energy) either if it were not in the GU’s standard. Still, the house was cheaper than many other providers. PS: we could not finance it today anymore. So much would have to be left out so that everything remains affordable at 4% interest, but not necessarily. About ~100k would have to go, completely unrealistic to make that up by worse equipment, especially since the regulations now require EH55 and photovoltaic obligation. And downsizing does not help much for us anymore. PPS: last part of the discussion. I think the original poster can now question their calculation themselves. The most important thing is to be honest about your own wishes from the start, otherwise it will still be expensive afterward and even more expensive than if you plan it properly from the beginning.
 

Leokupp79

2023-02-16 11:48:22
  • #5
I understand, you want to have a buffer as security in case unplanned expenses occur. However, prepayments are usually not free of charge at most banks, so you end up paying extra. Have you compared offers to see if you can maybe find a middle ground?
 

Leokupp79

2023-02-16 11:52:25
  • #6
Where did you finance? Are there still options to build today at all or can no one afford it in the end?
 

Similar topics
10.07.2019Town & Country - Rotex Heat Pump12
20.08.2018Town & Country Flair Floor Plan Changes24
15.05.2021Town & Country Raumwunder 100 with few changes20

Oben