Dressing room with or without wardrobe

Of course man :D

Yes, that's true, but now I have a 25sqm bedroom with a wardrobe, two small rooms where I could sleep undisturbed would definitely make me happier :cool:

I also have Ivar 50er, which is just right for clothes on hangers. In the fabric Ikea boxes, items are folded: small T-shirts and other handy things.

In my experience, in front of a long wardrobe there should be at least 90 cm of aisle. If you have a lot of clothes, you often have to step back a bit to get an overview. Common wardrobes are 60 cm deep. Then there is the door depth; sliding doors add depth. Swing doors take up space in the aisle again and are not recommended. Pax without doors can also be nice without doors. You should consider that wardrobes cannot stand directly in front of a wall. With solid walls, there is a risk of mold formation. At 2.40 meters, you are well within the dressing room width. In my opinion, your child's room is also wide enough, so don't worry about that. However, in the upper floor layout, the bedroom and bathroom areas need to be optimized. Quite a few changes would need to be made to compensate for these shortcomings.

The Ivar 50 is the best cabinet I have ever had: no mold problem, no plastic laminate, can be designed however you like, and is not expensive. I don’t have the clothes rail matching the Ivar but have tied in a broomstick. I can easily move it in depth or install it at an angle so that my clothes fit on the hangers there. I don’t know why everyone likes to buy the Pax so much. I am extremely satisfied with the Ivar. Wardrobes with a depth of 60cm are too deep for me. Behind the stacks of clothes, there is empty space at the back.

The Ivar 50 is the best cabinet I have ever had: no mold problem, no plastic laminate, can be designed however you want and is not expensive. I don’t have the clothes rail matching the Ivar but tied in a broomstick. I can simply move it back and forth in depth or install it at an angle so that my clothes fit on the hangers there. I don’t know why everyone likes to buy the Pax so much. I am extremely satisfied with the Ivar. Wardrobes with a depth of 60cm are too deep for me. Inside at the back, behind the piles of clothes, there is empty space.

Based on this post and your previous ones, I suspect you want to store your clothes openly and minimally. In contrast, separate dressing rooms or closed wardrobes – their users apparently want to keep clothes out of permanent sight. Wardrobes are rarely decorative due to their size, no matter the model. We (also for that reason) prefer storage in a separate room. There, PAX units are arranged in a U shape, without doors (except for two mirrored doors at the head) for direct view. The whole is separated from the bedroom by a glass sliding door.

Thank you very much for your feedback!
That really felt good in that way :)

...unfortunately, there is still no brilliant idea for sleeping/bathroom :(

Wardrobes with a depth of 60cm are too deep for me. There is empty space at the back, behind the stacks of clothes.

You can stack shirts and sweaters in two rows one behind the other. For example, red shirts in front and blue shirts behind. And if I want to wear a blue shirt, I push the stack of red shirts aside. I love Pax because they have so many options for the interior layout. For example, the piece for hanging trousers is great, you have all the trousers at a glance. Even better was the piece for shoes, but unfortunately it is no longer available.