Development according to §34 - Impact on the house position

..., is it reasonable to mark the parking spaces here like this?

If one wants to build a carport or similar (possibly later), this is consequently the only reasonable positioning with a 7 m front yard.

Structural installations such as carports are generally not allowed to be placed within the typical 5 m distance from the street to the building boundary (as a building window).

[QUOTE="Otus11, post: 260322, member: 25531"]If you want to build a carport or similar (possibly later), with a 7 m front yard this is consequently the only sensible positioning.

Structural installations like carports are basically not allowed to be placed within the typical 5 m distance from the street to the building boundary (as a building window).[\/QUOTE]
The area in front of the carport cannot be used as a "front yard" anyway, since this is where the driveway to the carport is. Therefore, I find this space wasted and would like to be as close to the street as possible. I can at least make use of the space behind the carport, and it is not concreted over as a driveway. Therefore, I do not understand why this positioning is supposed to be sensible.

The direct neighbor built their garage/carport starting at 5 m. I would find that acceptable, and would even prefer closer to the street.
[ATTACH type="full"]21017[\/ATTACH]

Actually, as I have already written in previous posts, I would prefer to have the parking spaces in front of the house.

I had understood it to mean that the parking space/carport should then also be located in front of the house, not just 2 meters closer towards the street,... The latter is of course quite possible.

Here in Berlin, no parking spaces are mandatory, unlike perhaps in other federal states.

Learned something new!

Hence the question whether these marked ones are really binding.

Then why does the architect mark them at all? Or does he come from NRW and, like me, have no clue about Berlin?

Since a carport is also permit-free here, who cares where it is located, as long as the maximum boundary development, height, etc. are observed?

Maybe the building authority? Maybe they are like and the Higher Administrative Court of Munich’s opinion that all structures belong behind the (actual) building boundary.

Structural facilities like carports may generally not be erected within the typical 5 m distance from the street to the building boundary (as the building window).

That could be of interest, for example, to neighbors, the building authority, or the road maintenance authority. I am interested in the legal basis on which uses the word "generally" here.

I had understood that the parking space/carport should then also be positioned locally in front of the house, not just 2 m closer towards the street,... The latter is of course quite possible.

Well, you probably have to look on site to see what looks good. If you are the only one in the street who does it all the way to the front, that's also stupid.

If you’re the only one on the street doing that all the way to the front, it’s kind of stupid.

That’s why you also have to keep 5m distance from the virtual building boundary.
Carport all the way in the front is not....