Development according to §34 - Impact on the house position

And, don't spoil this seven meters of anticipation at the entrance with a carport.

You mean it should rather be next to the house? So that I don't constantly see it from the front yard?

I recently read the paragraph including comments. If I remember correctly, the rules apply to the entire developed area. So also to outbuildings like garages and carports. This could mean that you are not allowed to use the 7 meters for a covered parking space. Conversely, for your discussion, it might be beneficial if one of your neighbors has a carport or garage closer to the street than their house...

I have also read something like that before. I have not been there for a long time and do not know exactly how it is with the neighbors, but according to aerial images, it looks like the immediate neighbor has built his carport significantly closer to the street than the house...see attachment.

You mean it should rather be next to the house?

No, I mean: give the car a nice parking space in front of the house and without a roof. The car itself is fine there, and for the second set of tires, etc., you have the shed.

I recently read the paragraph including comments.

Which paragraph do you mean? Can you give any hints where to find the comments?

Also for ancillary buildings such as garages and carports.

To my knowledge, the same rules apply to §34 of the Building Code as in the planned area according to §30 of the Building Code. Unless the development plan expressly prohibits it, parking spaces and garages are also permitted outside the buildable area. The "factual building boundary" therefore only limits the buildings and structural installations that must be within the building envelope in the development plan. If there are comments or court rulings to the contrary, I am very interested.

Parking spaces and garages are also permitted outside the buildable area. The "actual building boundary" therefore only limits the buildings and structural facilities that must also lie within the building envelope in the development plan.

In the present individual case, I still believe the original poster would do themselves no favor by disfiguring the front garden with a roof for the car.

Which paragraph do you mean? Can you provide hints on where to find the comments?

I do mean §34 of the Building Code.

The commentary I had read, I cannot find at the moment. But another one, which is not quite as explicit but still applies: BauBG_BauNVO_34_BauGB.pdf
A well-known search engine finds it quickly.

Then page 405, paragraph 75 (ee), last sentence. A judgment is also in the footnote. If you interpret it differently, please let me know.