DerGuteTon
2019-07-22 10:21:38
- #1
Of course, I’m not bothered by having more sockets. Not at all. But you have to weigh whether I prefer to pay extra cost XY for a sophisticated, comfortable socket network or invest the money in an "invisible" distributor behind the living room wall unit and then allocate freed-up budgets to outdoor areas, doors, or similar. The detailed planning of the sockets in terms of location (and then additional needs) is still pending for me. But I feel that a double socket in every corner of the living room would be enough for all contingencies plus TV and LAN. In the current 27 sqm living room, we are currently using 4 sockets. The issue of purchase price/house value is of course an argument for many. But not really for me. Ultimately, I primarily plan on living in the house myself until the end if all goes well. Paying attention to the resale value when building a house requires a lot of foresight. I don't want to speak ill of that. But it’s the wrong motivation for me if I design the house primarily for my/our needs... But I will reconsider it once more.For comparison: We have 2x3, 2x2, 2x1 sockets plus a total of 3 in the window recesses. In addition, TV and 2x LAN. And that in a 25 sqm living room. So far, I haven't been able to complain about having too many sockets. For me, there should be a double socket in every corner of the room. You need quite a few behind the TV alone. TV, receiver, PS4, possibly a stereo system... That's already four sockets gone. Then possibly decorations or lighting. I don't think it makes sense to start with a triple distributor in a new building. Demands aside, but if I were to inspect a 10-year-old house and found only 5 sockets in the living room, I would deduct €15,000 from the purchase price for a new electrical installation.