Comparability of costs Architect vs. General Contractor

  • Erstellt am 2021-03-04 16:57:35

WilderSueden

2021-03-11 20:31:07
  • #1
It depends on where you build. In many areas, KfW55 is now mandatory, as well as the photovoltaic system on the roof. The builder simply has no other choice. And on the subject of ventilation... it is absolutely crazy to build efficient houses (and I also count the Energy Saving Ordinance among them) and then constantly open the windows in winter and let the heat escape again. Then you might as well leave out half of the insulation. Nowadays, I don't really consider building houses without ventilation to be sensible. And in the end, it doesn't matter whether things are standard, regulation, or just the builder's wish. What counts is the price that comes out with the builder's wishes, and some providers already have a method of working with air heating and factoring in the upselling. But you don't have to build with them either ;)
 

Nordlys

2021-03-11 21:50:17
  • #2
I assume that with a correct and reputable provider, a standard house is approval-capable, suitable for year-round living, and properly ventilable. For us, this meant the FHZ was standard, the gas condensing boiler with solar thermal, the exhaust system in the bathroom with continuous window rebate ventilators, triple-glazed branded windows, a Ytong wall structure with 30 cm Planblock and plaster application. The building easily meets the Energy Saving Ordinance standard; with a heat pump instead of gas, KFW 55 would be achievable. WHAT is NOT standard and what I do not expect are roller shutters, colored windows, painted interior doors, two-shell facing brickwork, a controlled residential ventilation system, photovoltaics, geothermal or pellet heating, clay roof tiles, to name just a few things that some consider important but are a matter of individual taste. I drive a basic Golf, it has exactly two extras, four doors, and a 110 HP engine with six-speed transmission. Otherwise basic. Yet it is still a complete car. Just as a comparison.
 

Tolentino

2021-03-11 21:53:16
  • #3
In Berlin, living space must be 2.50m high. "Poor but airy"...
 

ypg

2021-03-11 22:16:34
  • #4


I agree with Karsten!

Standard is the basic version. The house works with energy-saving ordinance quality. Everything else can or must be added.
It’s like with a car: one brand, three models, all available in the basic version. Packages are offered: comfort, racing, technology... everything else gladly in a modular system.
Instead of automatic climate control, some need the air conditioning (controlled residential ventilation), tinted rear windows (triple glazing) are mandatory, just like fog lights (higher ceilings) and ashtrays (pantry). Both are roadworthy and livable.
If I live and drive in the Harz, there is just the upgrade that is necessary: winter tires instead of all-season tires//photovoltaics as a requirement for new development areas.
 

askforafriend

2021-03-11 22:20:06
  • #5


By the way, it will be a complete living basement, so a heating system is supposed to go in there like in the rest of the house ;)

And hopefully the comment about “children starving in Africa” is meant to be somehow funny – otherwise, you wouldn’t be allowed to do so many things (and definitely not build a single-family house at all ;))



Yes, I noticed it here in the forum that when people say “my house only cost XX euros,” it’s probably a famous apples and oranges issue.



Everyone should do it how they want ;) But what always leads to the same discussion: I’m sure that you can also build a fairly simple house with an architect, without much frills – because you decide yourself about budget and style, right?
 

askforafriend

2021-03-11 22:23:41
  • #6


We are currently thinking the same about the KFW70 semi-detached house where we are still renting. Terrible, especially in winter, air quality is awful. Unbearable. We only have decentralized ventilation in the entire living-dining-cooking area and one in the bathroom. After 8 hours in the bedroom, nobody should come in from outside, they’d collapse. I'm surprised we’re still alive :D
 

Similar topics
01.03.2017Controlled residential ventilation - Yes or No?!31
03.03.2012Position controlled residential ventilation in the underground basement?16
23.10.2016Thermal insulation, Energy Saving Ordinance, KFW 70 / 55 / 40 - Your experiences31
23.10.2015Energy Saving Ordinance 2014 - Gas boiler without solar?38
10.01.2017Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 / KFW55 / Gas + Solar in 201628
09.09.2016Controlled residential ventilation and still open windows at night71
06.02.2018Solar for hot water/heating or better photovoltaic for electricity?21
10.02.2018Controlled residential ventilation or photovoltaic system? Seeking decision support, pros and cons18
31.12.2018Controlled residential ventilation with heat recovery instead of solar thermal energy?30
12.01.2019Will the Energy Saving Ordinance from 2021 make new construction unaffordable?27
25.03.2019Ceiling suddenly too small for controlled residential ventilation!54
18.03.2019Omit the single room rule? Controlled residential ventilation + gas heating, new construction57
24.07.2019Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 or KFW 55 for bungalow with air-water heat pump & controlled residential ventilation, optional photovoltaic47
09.09.2019Where is it most worthwhile to exceed the requirements of the Energy Saving Ordinance?14
13.12.2019Gas with solar thermal or heat pump? And possibly photovoltaics?13
05.01.2020Gas heating + photovoltaics possible without proof15
29.01.2020Fewer openable windows with controlled residential ventilation30
03.11.2020Single-family house with KfW55/controlled residential ventilation or Energy Saving Ordinance standard - experiences and opinions?22
05.11.2020Possibility to open windows with controlled residential ventilation - planning ideas60
10.02.2021Is KfW40+ possible even if photovoltaic and controlled residential ventilation were already required for KfW40?15

Oben