Bungalow 108 - Minimum price feasible?

Especially since at a colleague's apartment the lights get dimmer and flicker when electric cars are being charged in the street in the evening. Good idea, bad infrastructure. Same as always :rolleyes:

Where exactly is the excessive effort with the gas heating that turns victory into defeat? That would be a Pyrrhic victory.

If you plan with gas _and_ radiators, then you'll have a problem afterwards. If you plan with gas and underfloor heating, it's still somewhat acceptable. It's just not that efficient, but at least it works.

Gas heaters can last 20, 30 years.

A little bird once told me that this only applies to the old gas heaters and the new ones tend to give up after 10 years ;)

Because it was initially written that underfloor heating is a luxury. In this small bungalow, I do not find this to be the case, as every radiator requires space. Both the area it directly occupies, but also indirectly since it affects the arrangement of the furniture. This unusable space also costs money.

A little bird once told me that this only applies to old gas heaters and the new ones tend to give up after 10 years ;)

Was the little bird a plumber who recommends heat pumps?

By the way, a poorly, meaning roughly, sized heat pump usually doesn’t last 20 years either ;)

Plumbers don’t make much money on gas heaters, the hype is over. Guess why they advise against them...

And some people will still be surprised by the electricity costs…

To be honest, I don’t know who the franchise partners are.

But you should know that (or want to). The brand and system provider typically only acts as a marketing and legal department, mainly relevant for you as the addressee of a possible withdrawal, but your practical builder is the franchisee (whose specific understanding of quality may differ from that of a colleague). already named one for you in post #46, who, in his (often shared by me) assessment, is good.

Where is this Lehmann Massivbau located?

That interests me as well. I found several similarly named companies, just all far from you.

A corner bungalow would definitely appeal to us more visually.

A "corner bungalow" costs so much more by design that it more than compensates for moderation in living space. In the 110 sqm class, it’s okay for a couple, but for a family with children, there are more suitable basic types for this size class. A major price driver of the corner bungalow is the complex roof with many ridges. The Town & Country model I found is one I’m not sure how to classify in this respect: the floor plans of both versions show it as also coverable with a rectangular roof—but the views on the same website (from Town & Country itself) show it with a corner roof. You can find an example of a bungalow of almost 110 sqm in realistically affordable construction here from (however, for a couple). But I probably see you more in a classic "one-and-a-half-story," which as a building type is THE economy bestseller for young families. Because of the "look," that doesn’t have to mean boredom—so no fear of the rectangle little house!