Building application or building notification

With us, the architect has drawn the terrace outside the building envelope (where it is supposed to go), but as a result, we automatically no longer comply with the development plan because the terrace is by definition part of the house and thus the house has exceeded the building envelope. The unfortunate solution is to (at least for now) cancel the terrace.

But isn't the terrace actually an ancillary facility?

But isn't the terrace actually a secondary facility?

No, it is part of the main facility. The problem with terraces is that your view was also held for years by many building permit authorities and urban planners, and therefore terraces played no role in the approval of building applications and the preparation of development plans. However, this view did not withstand judicial review. Newer development plans take this jurisdiction into account through larger building windows or corresponding exceptions in the textual provisions. For older development plans, one should simply not depict the terrace in the building application. This way, neither the architect nor the approval authority is put in the position of having to apply for or approve something that is legally contestable.

Well, for me the covered part is now registered as a terrace.

I just want to pave another 10 sqm outside the roof later on.
Could that then cause problems?

Well, for me the covered part is now registered as a terrace. I just want to pave another 10 sqm later outside the roof. Could that lead to problems?

Theoretically yes, because it would then be the same terrace and thus practically like a 10 sqm extension to the house. Whether someone from the building authority really goes around the streets to see who has carried out unauthorized construction measures is rather unlikely. An anonymous tip from a neighbor is always possible, depending on the sympathy.

Well, for me, the covered part is now registered as a terrace.

I just want to pave 10 sqm more outside the roof later.
Could that lead to problems?

Well, that would probably be a question for Radio Yerevan, from how much gap in between it legally counts as two installations.