160m2 detached house in timber frame construction on the north slope with basement

  • Erstellt am 2018-08-26 17:03:52

kbt09

2018-09-03 21:07:35
  • #1
This knee wall holds up when you position it so that the rooms can be used; the usable living area is smaller, but not the exterior area to be built.
 

Lbx

2018-09-03 23:00:14
  • #2

Instead of >1.80m knee wall in the attic, it's about 50 cm. That should already bring a considerable saving and is also smaller in terms of living space.
 

kbt09

2018-09-03 23:06:14
  • #3
Your external dimensions are identical to the original design except for the little knee wall. What exactly should have changed due to the little unusable space in the attic? A carport has been added. Excavation remains, garden design remains, the roof area is probably slightly larger since it's steeper, so a bit more gable height will have to be built. Let's get an architect involved who can actually do the calculations.
 

11ant

2018-09-04 01:45:34
  • #4
I fear I understand: the father of the naive idea is, "knee wall equals surcharge, less knee wall equals less surcharge" (?) No, that does not bring a saving, because the less usable space has to be compensated elsewhere. He certainly avoids a full story that way, yes. But the knee wall is not only supposed to create working height for vacuum cleaners. It is also supposed to provide space for beds and dressers. And it does not do that at this height. A dwarf knee wall is worse than no knee wall at all: simply because it forces the nonsensical combination "knee wall and knee high wall". Even fools only do that in their first year of apprenticeship.
 

Kekse

2018-09-04 06:59:42
  • #5
And he doesn’t really save anything worth mentioning. During the planning phase, we turned our barely one-story house into a real two-story house (completely without sloping roofs), which cost about 12k (gross!). Sure, that’s money, but it’s not decisive for the overall outcome. If we wanted to, we could save that again during the fittings.
 

kaho674

2018-09-04 07:16:28
  • #6
I don't think the basic idea is that bad. But trying to save money with it is rather nonsense. You have to slim down the footprint. This bedroom on the ground floor, can that be removed? Closet gone, WC smaller, pantry relocated, squeeze everything together, the entrance area is gone anyway. Then it will slowly work.
 

Similar topics
20.07.2013Do the costs increase with a higher knee wall?12
21.02.2014How high is my knee height?20
29.05.2016Single-family house, single storey, knee wall, upper floor window30
12.10.2016Kniestock lowered afterwards34
26.03.2017Raising knee walls: feasibility, costs, alternatives?10
21.08.2017Attic size at 1.50m knee wall height10
02.02.2018Is the knee wall too low? What does the measurement refer to?22
25.04.2018Kniestock Danwood House in Schleswig-Holstein - What is the maximum possible?23
10.06.2018Build a house with a knee wall 75cm high or two full stories? Your opinion?17
18.01.2019Full floor or with knee wall?20
27.08.2019Building plan stipulates knee wall is inadmissible16
30.10.2019Increase knee wall height - exceed eaves height?22
27.12.2019Low ridge height results in a low knee wall55
01.07.2020Calculation for a single-family house with 175m² living area, basement, and double garage79
05.10.2020Questions about the development plan (full floors, knee wall)11
01.09.2020Are building plans with a 1m knee wall still up-to-date?16
12.10.2020Separating the knee wall from the living space, what is durable?14
24.07.2021Extension or knee wall height increase?12
20.05.2023Large dormers or high knee wall?33
27.06.2023How to achieve Bremer 2/3 solution with high knee wall?13

Oben