130 sqm L-shaped bungalow including double garage

I am not an opponent of connection (door), but merely a questioner.

And that very persistently I understand that: I am as well

And very persistently

Yes – mind you, not to proclaim my personally positively experienced model of the detached garage as gospel. But because here, in very many house positioning threads, we see how people almost despair, even though their dream house actually fits perfectly on their plot – just because they are trapped in the thought pattern that the car must, in some way, sleep under the same roof as the other family members. Sometimes you have to say: cars do not have to hear mom’s voice, cars don’t need a baby monitor, cars genuinely have absolutely zero fear of ghosts under their bed. And thanks to [Drei Wetter Taft] you also don’t necessarily have to get from the breakfast table to behind the wheel with dry feet. Just googling “magic triangle” opens the view that a miserable holy connecting door can certainly also fulfill the same “function” that philosophers call a “dilemma.” In this sense: a hearty sword strike at the contact point between house and garage can work wonders – you don’t have to demonize this connection; simply downgrading it from a “must” to a “nice-to-have” is often enough for the ensemble to fit on the plot. Or put differently: the priority order “garage – terrace – room arrangement” can make suitable plots appear to be problem cases (which equally applies to dogmas about house and roof shape). A plot is “more” than just an enemy of the plan, a Pinterest favorite house to be built 1:1.

Is the garage actually allowed to be located outside the building window as a boundary construction? One could then possibly arrange the garage and house as shown in the sketch. The house then effectively has a very slight L-shape, but there are also usable floor plans for that.

Entrance and access through the garage would then come out at the same place and thus require only minimal additional space.

Yes, your idea spun a little further. House on the building boundary in the east to fully utilize the south/west sun.

Yes, your idea elaborated a bit further. House on the building boundary in the east to fully utilize the south/west sun.

A driveway that is too long should be avoided.
In addition, one should differentiate between the use of sun and between garden design and light incidence in the house.
I would probably also place the house on the east boundary.

Yes , that's more or less how I have it in mind as well. Just as and point out — so shift it to the eastern border so that the western sun and terrace can be utilized. Whether it is legally acceptable in terms of building/planning law, I would have to check again... Border construction by garages and carports is indeed allowed in one area because it is a public walkway here. The question is only whether that remains the case if the residential unit and garage form one building?
The second problem in my opinion: The entrance would then have to be relocated to the west, since no entrance is visible from the south side of the street (the garage is standing in front). By the way, the walkway leads to nowhere/farmland because the assisted living has not yet been built.
That would mean the entrance is in the west and thus directly next to the terrace???

you also apparently stubbornly stick to your opinion and apparently can never accept other people’s ideas if they involve garages on the house? And those examples like baby monitors, ghosts, mom’s voice are totally far from any objectivity and just completely tasteless.