Your opinion: Is TEUR 370 financing feasible?

  • Erstellt am 2013-11-04 10:43:41

Elektrofuzzi

2013-11-08 08:31:47
  • #1
Good morning,

here you can see as the best example that qualified advice at a good bank is absolutely necessary.
In principle, I agree with you. We had the following financing options on the table: annuity loan, standard building savings contract, and building savings contract with Riester.

The standard building savings contract was the most expensive.
The annuity loan followed, with the (for me) biggest drawback, a term of 25 years and then another 5 years with a fictitiously calculated 6%. The bank did not want to fix the interest rate for more than 25 years.
The Riester building savings contract was the cheapest including the deferred taxation.

I also had the following requirements, which I absolutely did not want to deviate from and which were only met with the Riester contract:

max payment €1500
max term 25 years including 100% repayment.
Now the payment has increased slightly, but with it, I was able to "cancel" my normal Riester savings plan, which a) gave me better financial flexibility and b) increased my equity by €10,000.

Due to the term (exactly now 24 years and something between >5 and <12 months), I have 12 years until retirement to save for the deferred taxation, which with a net rate of 42% amounts to approx. €17,500, so after the house is paid off €112 per month without interest effects, whether the tax rate will really be 42% is another matter. I calculated with the current worst case. Of course, my current tax allowance of €154 ("still" no children) and €770 (taxes) (for approx. 37–38 years) must be offset here, which makes a total of about €35,000.
Especially the tax refund is very worthwhile with a higher income.
If you are married, there is double the allowance with joint assessment --> but I am not exactly informed here, I may be mistaken.

If I were not financing such a huge amount, I would probably have decided on a 15-year annuity loan with high repayment, but with this amount I do not do that.
And personally, I can only advise everyone in the current interest rate situation to find a bank that fully finances the project 100% right away, even if it gets a bit expensive. So what --> my parents had to pay 13%.

By the way:
I have an 850m² plot, a stepped floor with 171m², and good equipment and pay about €650 in interest monthly over the years. As rent, I would easily spend twice that. Adjusted for inflation, it's almost free.

Best regards

In the end, it depends on whether you can afford it, have a clear conscience, and above all, the loan is "transparent."
 

humi

2013-11-08 08:39:07
  • #2


You should already include the deferred taxation at this interest rate (it is difficult to calculate), otherwise you cannot really compare the interest rates...
 

HilfeHilfe

2013-11-08 09:17:22
  • #3
Hello

yes, there are rarely fixed interest rates for over 20 years. After that, fictitious rates are applied. But since you should start with 2% repayment, you are already looking at a 30-year term. Then add special repayments and you quickly end up with a total term of less than 20 years.

And yes, fictitious rates are also applied in taxation. There is also no guarantee that the tax burden will be as assumed....
 

Elektrofuzzi

2013-11-08 09:18:22
  • #4
I have above a vague statement regarding the downstream taxation.
My payable burden should be around 21,000€.

Otherwise, it is quite easy to calculate.

As an example for calculating the fictitious housing support account (by the way, the state calculates with a 2% interest effect on the account)

Duration until retirement 38 years
Contributions to the housing support account 154€ + 770€ = 924€ annually plus 2%

Result of the housing support account approx. 53,000€ at retirement.
In advance, I decided to pay the tax burden in a lump sum --> less 30%
53,000 * 70% = 37,100 less personal tax rate, worst case 42%
37,100 * 42% = 15,582€ tax burden

Correct me if I am wrong.
 

Elektrofuzzi

2013-11-08 09:19:47
  • #5

Well, should you count on special repayments from the start?
Personally, I find that too vague.
 

Musketier

2013-11-08 09:56:32
  • #6
It would be interesting to know how you factor in the other risks of Riester. Simply selling the house or renting it out without having to repay the subsidies is then no longer possible. For me, additional retirement provision through Riester is by far safer.
 

Similar topics
19.02.2013Is a Riester loan useful for my case?13
21.12.2011Current experiences with interest rate conditions15
10.04.2012Financial plan with a building savings contract or with risk?12
16.02.2015Pre-financing Schwäbisch Hall Wohnriester savings contract/variable loan16
18.04.2015Is a building savings contract still worthwhile with the current interest rates?10
14.07.2020Beginnings of a possible property | Questions about the building savings contract72
11.08.2015What can I realistically afford as a rate?51
28.11.2015Building savings contract with advance loan versus annuity loan13
29.05.2016Conditions for Riester home savings contract - What interest rate?16
27.06.2016Building savings contract or annuity loan - final decision!45
18.01.2018Annuity loan vs. home savings contract - comprehension questions47
06.03.2018Building savings contract and Wohnriester - Where is the catch here?28
28.05.2018Annuity loan vs. building savings contract 300k loan10
12.06.2018Use Riester pension for financing?30
21.11.2018Financing with a building savings contract?18
01.06.2019Financing with grace period loans + building savings contract50
11.01.2021Financing offer: TA loan with building savings contract24
03.11.2021Short-term loan (3 months) for bridging purposes11
15.12.2022Follow-up Financing 2030 Prepare Now Building Savings Contract/Special Repayment/Fixed Deposit64
25.11.2022Increase repayment or top up building savings?20

Oben