Elektrofuzzi
2013-11-08 10:01:45
- #1
It would be interesting to see how you factor in the other risks of Riester. Simply selling the house or renting it out without having to repay the subsidies is no longer possible then. For me, an additional retirement provision through Riester is by far safer.
In my first post, I had already written that these things can certainly be solved with the necessary foresight. When selling, I have at least 2 years' time to invest the subsidized amount into another contract or property. The same, of course, applies to renting out (which I personally exclude). So these things are plannable, unless it comes to a distress sale, but then you have completely different problems.
Up until my time in the nursing home, I don't think about it first, as no one can really estimate if it happens.