Based on the picture, I also assume so. But based on the picture, I am firmly convinced that it is a building = house, because for this structure you definitely need a building permit as well as all public connections. You cannot just place such a container house on someone else’s meadow. It is exactly like a brick house. Therefore, the contract design will be interesting (with the person who owns the land).
Suggests that it is owned by the father.
Thank you very much for your assessment. A building permit apparently was not present; the building authority repeatedly admonished the container construction. Unfortunately, I do not know the letter, but the lawyer claims there is a court ruling on this, which is credible: Quote from the lawyer: “Decision of the Administrative Court Würzburg Az. W5K 23.302. Since the property is a private green area according to the land use plan and any construction there is inadmissible in every respect, a building removal procedure must be expected at any time.” So illegally built.
I just questioned my sister; she was on site and now claims the container does not have wheels but is transportable. So, according to her description, probably not real estate and the heir must actually bear the demolition costs as things currently stand if I understand correctly.