Who has to pay the demolition costs for container construction?

  • Erstellt am 2024-07-13 19:58:42

BauBine123

2024-07-17 12:00:37
  • #1

I just uploaded another picture. Unfortunately not completely visible... also the approximate size in the last post. Ok, since I have no knowledge about it at all, I have now "accepted" the figure of €45,000.
 

BauBine123

2024-07-17 12:14:00
  • #2
Once again: I do not have to renounce anything because, as a compulsory heir, I cannot "inherit" debts. Only assets. Of course, as an heir, one can inherit debts. ;-)

Thank you very much for your assessment (paragraph 3). I hoped to hear something along those lines. Unfortunately, I (yet) know nothing about the contract. I hope to get more information possibly from an excerpt of the land register. A lawyer at this point could not obtain this information (out of court), that’s what I found out. I am represented by a legal community; they work on a commission basis.
 

BauBine123

2024-07-17 12:24:22
  • #3
Thank you all again for the clue about the distinction between movable and immovable property. Whether containers are real estate or not. It was not clear to me that there is a distinction here. As you can see, I have always lived in rented accommodation.
 

nordanney

2024-07-17 13:10:29
  • #4
Based on the picture, I also assume so. But based on the picture, I am firmly convinced that it is a structure = house, because for this construction you definitely need a building permit as well as all public connections. You cannot just place such a container house on someone else’s meadow. It is exactly like a brick house. Therefore, the contract design will be interesting (with the person who owns the land). This suggests that it is owned by the father.
 

BauBine123

2024-07-17 13:46:35
  • #5


Thank you very much for your assessment. A building permit apparently was not present; the building authority repeatedly admonished the container construction. Unfortunately, I do not know the letter, but the lawyer claims there is a court ruling on this, which is credible: Quote from the lawyer: “Decision of the Administrative Court Würzburg Az. W5K 23.302. Since the property is a private green area according to the land use plan and any construction there is inadmissible in every respect, a building removal procedure must be expected at any time.” So illegally built.

I just questioned my sister; she was on site and now claims the container does not have wheels but is transportable. So, according to her description, probably not real estate and the heir must actually bear the demolition costs as things currently stand if I understand correctly.
 

nordanney

2024-07-17 13:50:17
  • #6
So an illegal construction. A demolition order is more than credible.
 

Similar topics
12.02.2014Transfer property to son, contractually exclude daughter10
18.03.2015Buying property feasible - Loan with building savings as equity?12
04.07.2015House contract with financing condition, lawyer wanted10
22.03.2016Temporarily lease land26
16.09.2016False information about the property in the exposé39
16.01.2017No building permit as long as the land is not developed?10
22.01.2018Building on still foreign land - Waiting for building permit25
23.06.2019My property, building together51
22.11.2023Location of city villa or single-family house on 500 m2 plot - rectangular585
24.06.2020House on parents' property - inheritance problems?161
11.04.2020Construction law - hire a lawyer or not yet16
11.05.2021Neighbor is building a retaining wall on my property. What should I do?87
28.04.2020Buy property in advance with family advance payment13
09.07.2020Register a building burden retroactively on your own property?13
07.11.2020Notary contract land inspection: should it be done or not?24
05.09.2022Buy the plot separately or finance it together?15
24.09.2022Neighbor grounding and drainage on our property41
28.06.2024Building permit - is a lawyer useful?12
06.10.2024Property with building after inheritance11

Oben