False information about the property in the exposé

  • Erstellt am 2016-09-12 17:39:32

Payday

2016-09-12 20:23:41
  • #1
The stupid thing here is that you have already signed something with the broker. One way now might be through the method that the broker doesn't even have a contract from the owner and therefore can't sell you the property. It will just be difficult to prove. If the owner has signed something somewhere, you will have to pay the commission. Alternatively, you could also wait until the contract between the broker and the owner ends (possibly) or you talk to the owner about sharing the commission or something similar (depending on supply and demand). Why the buyer-pays principle does not apply in sales can only be understood by a real estate-corrupt politician...
 

funky123

2016-09-12 20:29:08
  • #2
Yes, I have thought about this method before. So the seller definitely didn't sign anything. He was, as already mentioned, called and asked if the agent could also post his listing on their site. I will arrange a consultation appointment with the lawyer tomorrow. Does [die Rechtsschutzversicherung] usually cover something like this?

Thanks for all the answers!
 

ypg

2016-09-12 21:20:38
  • #3


The owner _does not_ have a contract with the broker, you do. Period. And what for the lawyer? You are not otherwise entering any obligation with the broker, it only refers to this property. You can avoid a lawyer in this case, since you clearly entered into something with the signature.
 

DG

2016-09-12 21:43:15
  • #4
Especially since, based on the description now given, I rather assume that the property is indeed considered "fully developed." If sewer, etc. are in the street, then that is the case, a completely normal procedure.

The catch here lies in the different understanding of "fully developed." This does _not_ include the house connection, which is misleading for laypeople—the term sounds as if nothing more needs to be done, but that is not the case.

In this respect, and if that is all: buy the property, check it off, done.

Best regards
Dirk Grafe
 

ypg

2016-09-12 21:49:37
  • #5
As says, I also think of this: Our property was also "fully developed," of course we had to pay a high five-figure amount for it. In this respect, I have to say ... ... Only what is stated in the contract counts anyway, a brochure is an offer, and the term is misleading for laypeople.
 

HilfeHilfe

2016-09-13 07:02:12
  • #6
You can skip the trip. The best solution is to talk to the broker and possibly agree on an amount X (but this is just a layman's opinion).
 

Similar topics
06.12.2019Neighbors' bushes on our property...37
21.03.2015Property and Real Estate Agent16
18.06.2015The plot must be developed. The general contractor says this is a priority!35
12.10.2015Plot with some special features - various questions34
29.01.2016At what value is the property assessed during financing?24
05.10.2016Apartment sale through an agent - what to pay attention to?27
16.01.2017No building permit as long as the land is not developed?10
15.03.2017Questions about a possible plot!37
13.06.2017Plot fully developed, additional costs?10
21.07.2017Buying a terraced house from a developer - contract content?71
04.05.2021Broker for owners - benefits / advantages?153
02.10.2018Negotiation strategy with the agent and the seller40
07.02.2019Smaller plot - Is something feasible from it?19
24.04.2020How do brokers negotiate the purchase price?43
02.02.2020Payment plan (Broker and Developer Regulation) and Developer's payment plan10
11.04.2020Construction law - hire a lawyer or not yet16
24.11.2021Plot of land in sight - looking for tips, tricks, suggestions39
29.10.2022Is the property fully developed? - Cable is partially missing10
27.01.2024House purchase through agent, now contract terminated18
10.07.2024Land financing, variable loan?20

Oben