Who has to pay the demolition costs for container construction?

my rights and obligations as an entitled person to the compulsory portion. Since I am not an heir

But you have understood the legal definition of an entitled person to the compulsory portion, haven't you? The spouse or the child are also entitled persons to the compulsory portion. Does that mean they are not heirs?
So, are there really no heirs, despite a spouse and children? You are mixing up many things.
Oh yes, it is stated in inheritance law and can be looked up there.

But you have understood the legal definition of a compulsory portion beneficiary, haven’t you? The spouse or the child are also compulsory portion beneficiaries. Are they therefore not heirs? So are there no heirs at all, despite marriage and children? You are mixing up many things. Oh yes, it is stated in inheritance law and can be read there.

Unlike you, I have understood it

Unlike you, I understood it

Very good. You would then just need to correctly reproduce what you have understood here. That you haven't understood it can be more than guessed from your texts.

To come back to your question once again. The mail will initially be received by the owner of the property. Whether he then involves the [Erbengemeinschaft], no one knows. So, who is now the owner of the property?

You have probably noticed yourself, but the forum is probably not the right contact here. If that is listed as a liability in the inventory of the estate (and it is not contestable), then, as I understand it, that is a claim against the deceased (he should have paid it) and then it would be part of the inheritance, wouldn't it? I would have thought that the claim then transfers to the community of heirs. My understanding is now that as a compulsory portion beneficiary no claims can arise directly against you, but for the calculation of the compulsory portion these are taken into account and thereby your claim is reduced (possibly to zero). However, this is all very much half-knowledge and presumably the lawyer who also advised you on the compulsory portion is the much better contact.

You have probably noticed it yourself, but this forum is probably not the right contact for this issue. If it is recorded as a liability in the estate inventory (and this is not contestable), then, as I understand it, this is a claim against the deceased (he should have paid it), and then that would be part of the inheritance, wouldn’t it? I would have thought that the claim then passes to the community of heirs. My understanding now is that as a compulsory portion beneficiary, claims cannot be made directly against you, but for the calculation of the compulsory portion these are included and thereby your claim is reduced (possibly to zero). But this is all very much half knowledge and probably the lawyer who advised you on the compulsory portion is a much better contact.

Hello, thank you very much!! What you write is not half knowledge but the reproduction of the legal situation as stipulated by inheritance law. Outstanding liabilities are to be settled by the heir(s). Compulsory portion beneficiaries receive a share if, after weighing assets and liabilities (including demolition costs), something remains of the estate. If nothing remains, but debts exist, the compulsory portion beneficiary does not receive this share.

Maybe I shouldn’t have brought up the inheritance at all, it only caused confusion and resentment.

Originally, I was only interested in who (probably) has to bear the demolition costs.

Then there was a bit of (unobjective) indignation, an evaluation or insinuation by some people here like "now she doesn’t want to pay for it." No, of course I don’t want to, because I have nothing to do with this matter, there was not even contact with the “perpetrator.” But I don’t have to be involved directly either. It only reduces my share.