Who has to pay the demolition costs for container construction?

To come back to your question once again. The mail will first be received by the owner of the property. Whether he then involves the community of heirs is unknown. So who is the owner of the property now?

Hello, thank you very much for your assessment. The owner is not my father, the deceased. And also not the heir, his sister. An acquaintance of both, with whom I have no contact and who does not want any either. So it is difficult to clarify personally. Everything is very difficult to comprehend anyway because there has been no contact for years. So, you suspect that perhaps the property owner has to bear the costs?

I would like to explain why I do not trust this estate inventory or why I want to research what my sister and I are still entitled to. It was prepared by the heir’s lawyer. The heir is definitely using tactics of obfuscation.

I can justify this (even though I do not have to defend myself) by the fact that in the past there was extortion, fraud, etc. Our mentally and physically ill father was manipulated and blackmailed by his sister, the heir (threatening letters found in his new “apartment”), until 1.5 years ago when he sold his beloved property. She lived off my father’s money for years (power of attorney for the bank account). From the proceeds of the house sale, she had a container built on her boyfriend’s property, “dumped” my father there, and emigrated to Turkey for a year with the rest of the money. My father, terminally ill, died shortly thereafter. This aunt wanted to deprive my sister and me of our compulsory portion, which is why she asked the lawyer to draw up a will stating that my sister and I wanted to murder our father. That is the only way to deprive someone of their compulsory portion. However, this was not valid in court because my father could no longer write it out by hand. That says enough about the heir’s and her lawyer’s methods.

No, I cannot afford a lawyer. It is also unclear how something like this would turn out against this opposing party. But even a lawyer would have no access to accounts before the case is litigated in court.

Not a nice story.

The owner is not my father, that is, the testator. Nor is it the heir, his sister.

A really stupid question.
If your father dies, you are the first-order heir according to the statutory inheritance order, which excludes the possibility that the father's sister (second-order heir) can inherit anything at all.
If the above is the situation, you are the sole heir or

what is still due to me and my sister.

You two together are the sole heirs.
That is what is written in the Building Code §§ 1924ff

I don’t understand your problem. If there is only father + two children, the father's sister inherits exactly €0, because she is not entitled to inherit. The law excludes that. What is actually going on with you? There must be more behind this.

No, I can’t afford a lawyer.

Then go to consumer advice. They also help in such cases for very little money. Although the situation is clear, provided you have reported it correctly.

Both of you together sole heirs.
That is what is written in the Building Code §§ 1924ff

Only if there was no will or inheritance contract. Then only the compulsory portion applies (which is half, like the standard share would be).

Just a really stupid question.
If your father dies, according to the statutory order of succession you are a first-order heir, which excludes that the father's sister (second-order heir) can inherit anything at all.
If the above-mentioned situation is the case, you are the sole heir or

both of you together are the sole heirs.
That is what is written in the Building Code §§ 1924ff

I don't understand your problem. If there are only father + two children, the father's sister inherits exactly €0, because she has no right to inherit. The law excludes that. What is actually going on with you? There must be more behind it.

Then go to consumer advice. They also help in such cases for very little money. Although the situation is clear, provided you have reported it correctly.

My father appointed our aunt, his sister, as sole heir by will. She also accepted the inheritance (confirmation from the court). So we are disinherited but entitled to the compulsory portion. All this is settled and confirmed.

This aunt wanted to deprive my sister and me of our compulsory portion, so she asked the lawyer to draw up a will stating that my sister and I wanted to murder our father. That is the only way to deprive someone of their compulsory portion. However, this was not valid in court.

Only if there is no will

That is what I was referring to.

My father appointed our aunt, his sister, as sole heir in his will. She also accepted the inheritance (confirmation from the court). So we are disinherited but entitled to the compulsory portion.

It would be nice if such small details came up earlier and not had to be dragged out like worms from the nose.