You can arrange the number of service phases with him
I generally advise, as the döner seller says, to take "with everything," meaning service phases 1 through and including 8; service phase 9 is "extra onions" and, in my opinion, a bit too much for a single-family house. Many home builders find it wise to make a cutoff after service phase 4—I don’t: after service phase 2 you know if you have the right one. Therefore, I recommend agreeing on an exit option after service phase 2, but otherwise to make the architect contract from service phase 1 through service phase 8.
Direct awarding is out of the question for us; we simply lack the time and experience for that.
With an architect, I always recommend a tender. That is not the same as direct awarding, but in my opinion still makes the most sense, namely in separate lots but still with the option to offer as a general contractor (GU). With a client-appointed and also site-managing architect, GUs are just as recommendable contractors as they are risk-free.
I can do the questionnaire at some point during the day. Is that okay here in the thread?
Freely after Günter Schabowski: to my knowledge, yes ;-)
If you have a plot with obstacles, I would definitely try to hire an architect!
Obstacle would be too strong a word, but the indecisiveness of the building authority regarding the building line or perhaps just the building boundary and whether or not to build relevantly on it or maybe just touch it with the little toe—that’s not entirely trivial.