Hannes34
2020-07-26 12:09:26
- #1
That's exactly what I wanted to bring up again:
Here the situation and neighbors are now being discussed centrally, but both plots are actually quite small. You really have to know very well how to build on them to make the best possible use of the property.
Is there any preference on your part? Driveway, entrance, orientation, view, soil conditions pro/con basement, development plan?
Do the 15m2 difference make a noticeable impact?
And is the price difference of almost 20k financially completely irrelevant, or could you then implement extras on the house/garden in the building gap that you would actually like but couldn’t afford in the new development area due to the higher land costs?
And an old trick: toss a coin – when the coin is in the air, most people know which side they hope for and the decision is made
The plans are basically finalized for both plots and the general contractor is already settled for us. We could live with both designs – of course, since it’s our planning...
As average earners, we do have to watch our money and the 20k does make a difference for us. However, compromises on the property can’t be corrected later. If in the end we feel more comfortable with the new development area, then we would take the extra money in hand – but we’d have to make cuts elsewhere or postpone measures longer.
Plot sizes under 500 sqm are now normal here, the municipality simply wants to offer as many plots as possible while using as little land as possible.
The largest plot in the new development area is, I believe, only "630 sqm," but you have to be able to afford that first. Here in our rural area, not everyone comes home with at least 2,500,- net.
Would the missing development plan and building according to § 34 of the Building Code actually have any disadvantages?