Uncertainties regarding size, planning itself is so far completed

That was in the children's room with my wife. She finds that so annoying ... We consciously avoided sloping ceilings, already in the first house.

1. No. Under my sloped roof it is absolutely quiet, at most you hear rain pounding against the non-roof window when it's windy.

2. With the same living area, the price difference is certainly not big. You should compare properly. 10x10x1.8m area under the roof, is that a flat roof? That sounds like money thrown away somehow, reads like a "cripple floor," where I couldn't even stand upright in one spot.
I much prefer my attic under the half-hipped roof, where I can at least walk upright everywhere in the middle, and on the sides when it gets "flatter," I can store things.

It is a hipped roof. But hearing that it’s money thrown away is new to me. I’ll just leave it at that.

But why should there be no difference with the same living area? More rows of bricks are needed.
But we are not talking about the 1.8 kneewall here, but about 1-1.2 m to a full floor.

And a dormer is then necessary, otherwise you would probably only be able to use the windows for looking out by standing on a stool. Visually it does enhance the house though.

I'm not talking about equal costs, but even more expensive - depending on the design. Stones don't cost much - elaborate drywall construction, on the other hand, does.

And you still don't address the question regarding depreciation.

By the way, I find classic dormers ugly. Just like two full floors with a pitched roof on top. Just like a half-hipped roof or hip roofs in general - tastes are like that... And that's fine.

It is undisputed that slopes are a matter of taste, but beyond that, one shouldn't talk nonsense that isn't true...

By the way, we only have slopes with 1.25m knee walls in three rooms - here it's portrayed as if one is practically overwhelmed by the slopes.

It is a hip roof. But this is the first time I hear that it is money thrown away. I'll leave it at that.

But why should there be no difference with the same living area?

If it is a hip roof, then you do not have 10x10x1.8, but only a spot in the middle with that height, around it is flatter, after a few meters crawl height.

With the same living area, the base area with a gable roof must be comparatively larger, so why should it be cheaper?

I'm not talking about the same cost, but even more expensive - depending on the design. Stones don’t cost much - elaborate drywall construction, on the other hand, does.

And you still don’t address the question about depreciation

By the way, I find classic dormers ugly. Just like two full stories with a pitched roof on top. Just like half-hipped roofs or hip roofs in general - tastes are just like that... And that’s fine.

It is undisputed that slopes are a matter of taste, but beyond that, one should not talk nonsense that isn’t true...

By the way, we only have slopes with 1.25m knee walls in three rooms - here it’s portrayed as if you’re practically crushed by the slopes.

I can't help your subjective assumptions about my statement. I didn’t say anything about being crushed, but you interpret things. Still, while we’re at it, a room with slopes definitely feels smaller than a normal one.
And a stool to look out the window is not a disadvantage? Putting furniture under a roof slope is also not a disadvantage? How is it with you, toilet or bathtub under the slope?
I can’t judge whether your room concept is so well designed that it doesn’t apply to you. I haven’t seen your floor plans.
I see this is a sensitive point for you. Why?
Or better, why didn’t you build two full stories? If there is no price difference.



Who builds a house larger in area just so that the usable space in the roof is bigger because they like roof slopes?

No one, so please compare the same floor area.

And I still believe that a house with the same floor area without roof slopes is more expensive than a normal one.
Sure, if you add a dormer on every side now, the price changes.

About our hipped roof
I would have preferred a house with a flat roof, but that was not allowed. So, I’m happy about the gained storage space. Since our basement of about 50m2 will eventually be used as a granny flat.

Who is interpreting here, please? Wunder Punkt? Yeah, sure...

Both bathrooms on the upper floor have no sloped ceilings, the beds are placed under the slopes of the two children's rooms, and in our bedroom our bed is under the slope - there is no space for more. So I don't even have a compromise with the furnishing, because it was planned that way from the start.

By the way, we have two flat roof extensions

And the double-wing windows are not installed for the view or distant view, but only for light.

Yeah, then we probably have a sophisticated concept

And for two reasons we didn't build two full stories: Because we find it ugly and because it was not allowed. But you always come up with the costs - are you honestly proud of that now? By the way: Why do you have only 50 sqm2 of basement in the floor area?