Bambula
2019-02-24 10:05:41
- #1
As mentioned at the beginning, we have only planned with "Variant 1" so far. Meanwhile, we like "Variant 2" more and more, so we will plan accordingly. The week after next we have the first appointment with the architect. If there are initial drafts, I will gladly post them here.Yes, nice! - I did not expect that at all, I thought they were already finished and secret.
130 sqm for house footprint, garage, and driveways would not be much.
130 m² would indeed be very tight. But the plot ratio = 0.4 is also stated in the plan. So can I assume that? Can a development plan actually be worsened after the publication of the legally binding version, for example by removing the plot ratio = 0.4 so that only the footprint = 130 applies?Based on the floor plan definition in 3(4) development plan in connection with §19(4) land use ordinance, it could already become tight.
Isn't a development plan created by experts? If your statement is true, is the development plan invalid in this form or can one choose the "more favorable variant"?Yes, but a development plan is basically a municipal law, and such deficiencies are, IMHO, unacceptable.