Escroda
2021-04-05 23:27:32
- #1
That would clarify the procedural freedom. However, important information is still missing. I will translate my regrets into questions:We would like a roof covering that would be 6-7 meters long and should extend 3.5 meters in depth.
Is there a legally binding development plan? If yes, would you like to show it, including the textual provisions?Too bad, OP made no statements about planning law.
Would you like to show us the site plan with the drawing of the residential building and the neighbor’s house?Too bad, OP did not show a site plan on which the existing development could be seen
Are there construction encumbrances or easements in favor of or burdening the property?Too bad, OP provided no information on construction encumbrances.
In BW the minimum distance is 2.5 m; for buildings with wall lengths up to 5 m it is even only 2 m. Would complying with the 2 m be an option?We cannot maintain the minimum distance of 3 meters to our neighbor.
Permit from whom?So we will not get around needing a permit.
Where?I have read several times now
Did he not want to sell last year? Or are the buyers even worse?That is unimaginable for our neighbor.
That depends...Does he really have to agree?
Where can one read that?I have only read that you are supposed to leave 3 meters of space to your neighbor.
On whose property does it stand?Our terraces are separated by a gabion fence.
Attempt succeeded, but the picture is not very conclusive. Best case: There is a legally binding development plan that sets open construction, limited to semi-detached houses, or closed construction, and the building boundary is at least 3.5 m away from the house => You do not have to ask anyone and just start building. Worst case: There is a legally binding development plan that sets open construction without restrictions, the residential building stands on the rear building boundary, and there is an encumbrance limited to the gable wall of the residential building => The encumbrance must be extended by a renewed declaration of encumbrance by the neighbor and an application for isolated exemption for exceeding the building boundaries must be filed with the municipality. Trouble threatens in both cases also from the fire protection side and the gutter. The first is not my field, but I have heard in passing that only with the new version of the state building code in 2019 in NRW firewalls are no longer required for terrace roofs at the boundary, which by contrast means they were necessary before and may still be in BW today, and the latter because the gutter may prevent the roof from being extended up to the boundary, i.e. being built with boundary distance and thus the 2 m would have to be observed again.I’ll try to attach a picture.