Stege90
2018-09-03 14:59:01
- #1
I am happy to explain our view on the two points mentioned. Regarding the slope of the pantry, my wife already shares a similar opinion. However, the wall of the pantry towards the front door is shorter as a result, and in my opinion, the tube-like part of the hallway is minimized to a minimum. Without the slope option, the wall would just be a bit longer, which would increase the zig-zag hallway effect again. Do you really think that would be the better option? Moving the front door further north is very difficult, as the front door would no longer appear "open" due to the parked car in front of it, and less light would enter the hallway. For this reason, we unfortunately cannot use the floor plan from you kbt09 in this regard. We now have to make the best out of this variant. But really, many thanks for the suggestion. We will keep the ideas for the bathroom in mind once we have clarified the fundamental "problems." We do not want the pantry in another location in the house, as we find the direct proximity to the kitchen practical.
Regarding the proposed wider staircase: We haven’t had the tread width calculated yet, but the staircase corresponds to standard dimensions. With 2.01 m, there remains about 80-85 cm of tread width. What are the advantages of a wider staircase? However, we would probably rather reduce the utility room and the upstairs office by about 30 cm, as this would then also “open” the hallway downstairs again. This way, the kitchen door would again be further to the left (as in the original case), but we would actually plan for two tall cabinets there and still have the door open to the left. With a stopper, that should really not be a problem.
The separation between the living room and kitchen/dining area is probably just a matter of taste. One person likes it one way, another the other way. Although the living room is in the northeast, we have a beautiful view through the large window front into the green garden. I don’t need any direct sunlight in the living room (topic heat/darkening). The guest WC and pantry in the south then simply result accordingly from the location of the house on the plot and the other conditions. We are now basically satisfied with that. We will not change anything about the room distribution anymore. We want to make the best of what is now given, as already mentioned above. Therefore, we would still be grateful for suggestions, especially regarding the arrangement of the windows on the south side (symmetry of bathroom windows/kitchen windows).
Regarding the proposed wider staircase: We haven’t had the tread width calculated yet, but the staircase corresponds to standard dimensions. With 2.01 m, there remains about 80-85 cm of tread width. What are the advantages of a wider staircase? However, we would probably rather reduce the utility room and the upstairs office by about 30 cm, as this would then also “open” the hallway downstairs again. This way, the kitchen door would again be further to the left (as in the original case), but we would actually plan for two tall cabinets there and still have the door open to the left. With a stopper, that should really not be a problem.
The separation between the living room and kitchen/dining area is probably just a matter of taste. One person likes it one way, another the other way. Although the living room is in the northeast, we have a beautiful view through the large window front into the green garden. I don’t need any direct sunlight in the living room (topic heat/darkening). The guest WC and pantry in the south then simply result accordingly from the location of the house on the plot and the other conditions. We are now basically satisfied with that. We will not change anything about the room distribution anymore. We want to make the best of what is now given, as already mentioned above. Therefore, we would still be grateful for suggestions, especially regarding the arrangement of the windows on the south side (symmetry of bathroom windows/kitchen windows).