Builderbob
2019-10-28 12:32:54
- #1
Hello everyone,
my wife and I are soon going to become homeowners ourselves and have had a floor plan created by our (prospective) prefabricated house supplier based on our first conversation.
We have a specific plot of land in mind, but the new development area is currently still being surveyed, and the parcels are being reorganized afterward. Therefore, there is no official site plan of the property yet, only the attached development plan excerpt (dashed lines = property boundaries).
We find the floor plan draft interesting at first glance, especially since it (at least for us) does not look like a standard floor plan from the provider. I have listed some points that I think could be improved below – surely you will notice more...
Thanks in advance for your assessments!
Thomas
Development plan/restrictions
Size of the plot - 47 sqm
Slope - no
Floor area ratio - 0.4
Site coverage ratio - 0.8
Building window, building line and boundary - Building window 10x20m, boundary distance 3m to street/neighboring property, edge development - possible, not planned
Number of parking spaces - 2
Number of floors - 2 full floors
Roof type - gable, hip, shed, flat
Style - modern
Orientation -
Maximum heights/limits - 9.80m height from road surface to top of building
Other requirements -
Builders’ requirements
Style, roof type, building type - not fixed (except: no flat roof)
Basement, floors - 2 full floors, no basement
Number of persons, age - 3 persons (36, 35, 1), prospectively a 2nd child
Space requirements on ground floor and upper floor - GF: open living/dining/kitchen area, pantry, work/guest room, utility room. UF: bedroom/bathroom/"dressing room", 2 children’s rooms, children’s bathroom
Office: family use or home office? - occasional home office, room shares function with guest room
Number of overnight guests per year - 5-10
Open or closed architecture - open
Conservative or modern construction - modern
Open kitchen, kitchen island - yes
Number of dining places - 6-10
Fireplace - yes
Music/stereo wall - no
Balcony, roof terrace - nice to have, not mandatory
Garage, carport - carport
Utility garden, greenhouse - no
House design
Who created the design: general contractor
What do you particularly like? Why?
GF: open living/dining area and yet no sightline from sofa to kitchen, short path from front door to pantry, separated area utility room/housekeeping room.
UF: children’s and parents’ area separated, no “trapped” dressing room, roof terrace, “sleeping platform” in children’s room
What do you not like? Why?
Generally: floor plan looks very elongated
GF: entrance area (in my opinion unnecessary), wardrobe far from front door (alternative under stairs?), WC too narrow(?), no direct access from kitchen to terrace (planned in SE/SW - "around the corner"), seating area in kitchen (will be removed or seating window bench planned), distance kitchen island/wall, passage living/dining too narrow if fireplace and piano (175x60) as planned are placed?
UF: children’s rooms in the north, bedroom in the south, “room” at exit onto roof terrace, overall space usage (large hallway 20 sqm plus 10 sqm “leftover” as “sauna room” (sauna for 2 people should be integrated in bathroom), bathroom rather small and dressing room quite narrow)
Price estimate according to architect/planner: 465,000 (without land, without additional construction costs)
Personal price limit for the house, including equipment: 500,000
Preferred heating technology: air-to-water heat pump, possibly with photovoltaics
If you had to give up, which details/extensions
- Could you give up: sauna, kitchen island, roof terrace
-Could not give up: fireplace, work/guest room, separate dressing room/“closet room,” 2 bathrooms on the upper floor
Why is the design the way it is now? e.g.
Standard design from the planner? - no
Which wishes were implemented by the architect? - design based on our room program and our “wish list” (e.g. fireplace, “window bench” in kitchen, spatial separation of living room and kitchen, no trapped dressing room)
What do you think is particularly good or bad about it? - bad: space usage on upper floor (20 sqm hallway + 10 sqm sauna/“residual room”), good: separation of “technical area” on ground floor and children’s/parents’ area on upper floor
What is the most important/fundamental question about the floor plan summarized in 130 characters?
Can planning continue based on this first draft or is it better to start over from scratch? If the latter, how better (classic rectangle?)?









my wife and I are soon going to become homeowners ourselves and have had a floor plan created by our (prospective) prefabricated house supplier based on our first conversation.
We have a specific plot of land in mind, but the new development area is currently still being surveyed, and the parcels are being reorganized afterward. Therefore, there is no official site plan of the property yet, only the attached development plan excerpt (dashed lines = property boundaries).
We find the floor plan draft interesting at first glance, especially since it (at least for us) does not look like a standard floor plan from the provider. I have listed some points that I think could be improved below – surely you will notice more...
Thanks in advance for your assessments!
Thomas
Development plan/restrictions
Size of the plot - 47 sqm
Slope - no
Floor area ratio - 0.4
Site coverage ratio - 0.8
Building window, building line and boundary - Building window 10x20m, boundary distance 3m to street/neighboring property, edge development - possible, not planned
Number of parking spaces - 2
Number of floors - 2 full floors
Roof type - gable, hip, shed, flat
Style - modern
Orientation -
Maximum heights/limits - 9.80m height from road surface to top of building
Other requirements -
Builders’ requirements
Style, roof type, building type - not fixed (except: no flat roof)
Basement, floors - 2 full floors, no basement
Number of persons, age - 3 persons (36, 35, 1), prospectively a 2nd child
Space requirements on ground floor and upper floor - GF: open living/dining/kitchen area, pantry, work/guest room, utility room. UF: bedroom/bathroom/"dressing room", 2 children’s rooms, children’s bathroom
Office: family use or home office? - occasional home office, room shares function with guest room
Number of overnight guests per year - 5-10
Open or closed architecture - open
Conservative or modern construction - modern
Open kitchen, kitchen island - yes
Number of dining places - 6-10
Fireplace - yes
Music/stereo wall - no
Balcony, roof terrace - nice to have, not mandatory
Garage, carport - carport
Utility garden, greenhouse - no
House design
Who created the design: general contractor
What do you particularly like? Why?
GF: open living/dining area and yet no sightline from sofa to kitchen, short path from front door to pantry, separated area utility room/housekeeping room.
UF: children’s and parents’ area separated, no “trapped” dressing room, roof terrace, “sleeping platform” in children’s room
What do you not like? Why?
Generally: floor plan looks very elongated
GF: entrance area (in my opinion unnecessary), wardrobe far from front door (alternative under stairs?), WC too narrow(?), no direct access from kitchen to terrace (planned in SE/SW - "around the corner"), seating area in kitchen (will be removed or seating window bench planned), distance kitchen island/wall, passage living/dining too narrow if fireplace and piano (175x60) as planned are placed?
UF: children’s rooms in the north, bedroom in the south, “room” at exit onto roof terrace, overall space usage (large hallway 20 sqm plus 10 sqm “leftover” as “sauna room” (sauna for 2 people should be integrated in bathroom), bathroom rather small and dressing room quite narrow)
Price estimate according to architect/planner: 465,000 (without land, without additional construction costs)
Personal price limit for the house, including equipment: 500,000
Preferred heating technology: air-to-water heat pump, possibly with photovoltaics
If you had to give up, which details/extensions
- Could you give up: sauna, kitchen island, roof terrace
-Could not give up: fireplace, work/guest room, separate dressing room/“closet room,” 2 bathrooms on the upper floor
Why is the design the way it is now? e.g.
Standard design from the planner? - no
Which wishes were implemented by the architect? - design based on our room program and our “wish list” (e.g. fireplace, “window bench” in kitchen, spatial separation of living room and kitchen, no trapped dressing room)
What do you think is particularly good or bad about it? - bad: space usage on upper floor (20 sqm hallway + 10 sqm sauna/“residual room”), good: separation of “technical area” on ground floor and children’s/parents’ area on upper floor
What is the most important/fundamental question about the floor plan summarized in 130 characters?
Can planning continue based on this first draft or is it better to start over from scratch? If the latter, how better (classic rectangle?)?