First floor plan single-family house - Your ideas also regarding the property

I usually don't write here, but the proposal is very close to our house, including the north arrow.

There will definitely be additional notes regarding the extension.

We built it as attached: room areas almost all identical. House 0.5m longer. Washer/dryer hidden behind the shower in the bathroom. 2x children facing west. Pantry under the stairs. One 12m2 room more on the upper floor in the gable. Just under 150m2 according to DIN.

We initially didn't want a bathtub either, but still decided on it.

Thank you for the helpful answer

The floor plan already looks very good.
I also like the arrangement of the tool shed next to the carport and behind the utility room (where no light is needed anyway).

Where is the technical room located? And out of interest, which room do you have in the gable?

Do you already live in the house? And if so, would you do anything differently in retrospect?

Without going into everything, if you are sure about the things then that’s fine

The pantry won’t work like this. Leave out the room and simply add two more tall cabinets to the kitchen in that spot. I would leave out the shower downstairs, no one uses it anyway, and turn the current wardrobe into a storage room.

The dressing room is actually too small as it is. I would leave out the wall, then the room overall benefits from the additional square meters.

I had already mentioned the dressing room and now I see it the same way.
If two women live in the house, a second shower definitely makes sense

He probably doesn't know your property yet.

And where is your suggestion for that? I think the order of the planning is still not right. First the floor plan and then see where to place it on the property leads to this:

Yes, the extension as it is doesn't make sense.
My suggestion would be to position the garage further east towards the property entrance. Behind it, shifted slightly to the right, the house. Behind the garage then the yard, which would also somewhat protect the house entrance through the garage.

Alternatively, I quite like the sketch from post 16.

This makes any further discussion unnecessary. On the one hand, you say there is still room for improvement, ignore the budget; on the other hand, you want to build efficiently and say that massive regional is cheaper, but you almost ignore the slope (which affects both efficiency and costs).
How is this supposed to work here? You just plan away cheerfully, and after two weeks, 25 posts and 15 pages, you have a draft, then you calculate and find out UPS 100k too much.
Honestly, I think you are getting lost here.
One should set the budget very early, compare it with its requirements for the room program, take the plot into account (keyword slope), and then roughly calculate whether you can make it.

Why unnecessary? And no, we are not burning ourselves.
Just because I have a budget X available does not mean that I want to fully use this budget.
I think we have described quite exactly what kind of house we need. There are several possibilities to implement this – and this implementation should be as cost-effective as possible.
If, based on our planning and ideas, we request offers and the house then costs 150,000 EUR more, we will decide for ourselves whether it is worth it or not.
Therefore, please consider only the plot and floor plan.

Just as an example, simply leaving out the basement and having a bit more square meters upstairs might be possible on an optimal plot and save some money, but with a slope the gradient must somehow be balanced without a basement. A slope of 1 m over 10 m of house already makes a difference.
Just like your idea to use the excavation to fill up. That might be possible under certain circumstances, but you also have neighbors and property boundaries. A few meters of natural stone wall to the boundary and the earthworks, we are talking about significantly five-figure amounts.
The general contractor who just comes up with a floor plan without considering the plot... I don’t know if that would be the man I trust.

For me, this is currently like shooting sparrows with cannonballs

If I knew everything, I would not ask my questions in a forum. My question is exactly about what makes sense and what does not.
Due to the slope, you could partially embed the basement, thus saving excavation and, for example, getting light into the hobby room. Maybe that makes more sense than enlarging the plot area and foregoing a basement in a sloping location.

Yes, living 6 months in the house.

We wouldn't change much on the floor plan, maybe after the thread here it might change a little more m2 perhaps in the living room (now 35m2) as a luxury, not necessarily needed.

Dimensions are 9.24x11.49 + gable. Thick walls. Hallway ground floor 1.6

Windbreak/more storage space at the entrance could be done. Strollers etc. fit in the utility room, but our technology is compact. I still find the orientation to the sun successful, that was important to us. Bigger is always possible, but all rooms are sufficient and not too small. The position of the extension depends on our property/building window, therefore not classically simply at the carport.

Please clarify the budget and the other questions here, then I am happy to continue contributing.

Why redundant? And no, we don’t burn ourselves. Just because I have a budget X available doesn’t mean that I want to fully use that budget. I think we have described quite precisely what kind of house we need. There are now several possibilities to implement this – and this implementation should be as cost-effective as possible. If, based on our planning and ideas, we get quotes and the house ends up costing 150,000 EUR more, we will decide for ourselves whether it’s worth it or not. That’s why please only consider the plot and floor plan

Why, I have already tried to explain. You’re putting the cart before the horse. Right now is the wrong phase to do that. The market is so crazy that no reasonable planner will spend much time on you without knowing your budget. On the surface it may seem fine, but nothing useful will come of it. What do you think, how much time does an architect spend creating a design? Only to then hear “Oh, that’s 150,000€ too expensive... let’s start all over again?” No, he will (rightly) ask for the budget in the first meeting and then calculate backwards. Subtract 10% as a buffer from your maximum, it will get more expensive anyway.

If I knew everything, I wouldn’t ask my questions in a forum. My question is exactly about what makes sense and what doesn’t. Due to the sloping site, you could partially dig the basement in, saving excavation and, for example, getting light into the hobby room. Maybe that makes more sense than increasing the plot area and giving up the basement on a sloping site.

No, you absolutely don’t have to. That’s why take the advice and inform yourself. Read what people write here in the forum and take a lot of it to heart. The people here are all significantly further along than you, already finished or have been doing this here for years in part. And if several people here tell you that something about your approach doesn’t fit, then I would think about it. At the moment it looks as if you’re ignoring the objections because you absolutely want to continue the floor plan discussion. If you want to do that, you can, but I don’t consider it productive. You will also quickly notice that the experienced “floor plan users” here in the forum (I do not belong to them) will quickly lose interest because they don’t want to work on a floor plan that might be discarded anyway. Because they don’t even get paid for it here Only fame and glory