chand1986
2018-06-05 06:31:07
- #1
Look, this is such a naive calculation. You yourself noticed the issue with the special repayment.
You must not also omit the equity.
And then you're already at 1300 annuity + 70k equity (just as an estimate) which also first has to be tied up outside more lucrative investments + the reserves for maintenance + X.
Does that really stand up to comparison with rent for equivalent properties if you calculate honestly? Usually not.
That’s why the purely economic viability only exists for people who lack savings discipline without the loan agreement.
A house is only really suitable as retirement provision in one case: built age-appropriate with enough equity so that at retirement it’s debt-free and still several years away from the first major maintenance investment.
But those who finance over 20 - 30 years afford a luxury item, but not retirement provision. That’s okay if you admit it.