Renovation of a 1960s house: Questionable expert recommendations?

  • Erstellt am 2021-05-01 12:16:08

apokolok

2021-05-03 16:32:47
  • #1
Almost everything was estimated way too high.
Heating pipes 12k :p
For that, you get fresh water, heating, and wastewater piping new, and there’s still some left over.
Electrical is enough with 15 if you don’t need KNX or 1000 spots.
The insulation above the rafters is also wasted money.
Remove the rigid foam boards, possibly put in a new underlay membrane, and then do new insulation between the rafters.
That costs 10% of the estimated amount for the insulation above the rafters and you can do it yourself quite well.
The roof is not new but not broken either.
In my opinion, the floorboards can still be renovated, it could just be a lot of work.
How do you get 12k for interior painting? Does the plaster need to be completely renewed or what? Painting should be done for 2-4k, can also be done yourself and only costs material.
You can get absolute luxury bathrooms for that money, nice ones are possible for 1/3-1/2 as well.
 

Winniefred

2021-05-04 10:54:42
  • #2
It's always a question of personal preferences. If you want to overhaul everything and reduce consumption as much as possible, you have to invest significantly more money and turn everything upside down. Or you say you only do the necessary and save a lot of money, but then live with higher consumption. That's more of a fundamental decision.
 

Asuni

2021-05-04 11:40:46
  • #3


Just briefly about the roof tiles. If I remember correctly, the house is covered with [Bieberschwanzziegel] - if these are properly installed and there are no significant weak points / defects on the roof, such a roofing, according to our roofer, can have a lifespan of 80 years.

Of course, it depends on what you want - if it is important to you that the roof is insulated with an underlay membrane, the roof tiles have to come off. If it is sufficient for you to insulate the roof with insulation between the rafters and insulate the top floor ceiling, the roof covering can be preserved. It depends on your needs regarding roof insulation (and your personal aesthetic preferences). A properly [Bieberschwanzziegel] covered roof that has no damage does not necessarily have to be renewed after 40 years.
 

schwalbe

2021-05-04 11:53:32
  • #4
Definitely. Maybe you notice while reading how I’m wavering. At first we wanted to renew many things, but not everything. After the surveyor slowed me down a bit and wanted to leave a lot as is, I became a bit more cautious. But after I realized how much funding is actually available, I’m currently back on the idea of a “comprehensive core renovation.” Many wild ideas are in play, right now I’m flirting with plenty of insulation, underfloor heating everywhere, and a hybrid heating system: heat pump with photovoltaic self-consumption, plus a buffer tank, to which a new wood stove with a water jacket is also connected.

Yes, that’s right, Biber tail. So far, no weak points are known, but no one has yet crawled into the tiny attic above the top floor. I know the tiles themselves would still last. If it comes down to insulation between rafters, they could stay on. With insulation above the rafters, I assume a new covering makes more sense than reusing the old tiles (see also the post with roof pictures). They are moss-covered and might look a bit strange on an otherwise completely “new” house; that’s where aesthetics come into play. I still have to delve deeper into the whole funding topic, but at first glance almost everything is subsidized, so my tendency is currently leaning toward new tiles. And “quite 80 years” also means “quite” and not “definitely.” Three major arguments currently speak for the core renovation for me: 1. only one big construction site and then peace 2. take advantage of subsidies now. Who knows how it will look in 20 years 3. technology concept feasible with which I can really be satisfied. I’ll develop several concepts and then discuss them with a KfW-compliant energy consultant. If there’s interest, I’ll gladly keep you updated here, then maybe the thread title should be adjusted.
 

Deliverer

2021-05-04 12:10:35
  • #5


Heat pump always without buffer, it only costs (a lot of) energy. The additional installation for integrating (and controlling) the wood stove alone will be four-figure and can never pay off. On top of that, a huge buffer, a very expensive stove... Try to keep it simple. So at most, in an emergency, if it's absolutely necessary, a small wood stove for the ambiance.

You can read up on the topic in the HTD forum.
 

schwalbe

2021-05-04 13:15:25
  • #6

Okay, heat pump and water jacket probably don’t go well together. I got a bit carried away ;-)
 

Similar topics
09.10.2016Roofing - Clay or Concrete?16
20.10.2016Water-bearing fireplace stove floor heating, heat pump, photovoltaic, new construction?28
27.04.2020Which roofing material is suitable for a flat shed roof?11
21.06.2016Heat pump with photovoltaics vs gas and solar thermal52
09.10.2018Costs for shell construction and roof covering/insulation - fixed price offer okay?25
24.07.2019Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 or KFW 55 for bungalow with air-water heat pump & controlled residential ventilation, optional photovoltaic47
20.11.2019Single-family house - Major renovation - Change of floor plan13
07.05.2020Collaboration of air-water heat pump, photovoltaic system, and storage38
26.06.2020KfW 55 Single-family house - Brick or Ytong?14
15.09.2020New single-family house or core renovation of a house built in 197839
19.02.2021Combine heat pump and water-bearing fireplace60
23.02.2025Condensate on the underlay membrane11
22.02.2021Stains on underlayment and roof beams10
20.04.2021Above-rafter insulation desired with existing photovoltaic system11
09.09.2021KFW 55 EE Funding - New Construction Brick Thickness/Ventilation System?25
04.03.2022Buy / Sell Heat Pump Privately117
23.12.2021Is purchasing a house and complete renovation affordable?33
18.08.2022Tiled stove in combination with air-to-water heat pump experiences?13
13.02.2024Heat pump is not compatible with a water-bearing fireplace144

Oben