Renovating a half-timbered house - low ceiling heights, are there possibilities?

  • Erstellt am 2020-07-24 14:15:01

Tamstar

2020-07-27 10:52:29
  • #1
Maybe. That was just said casually, I don't want to reach today's energy standards with that half-timbered house.
 

nordanney

2020-07-27 10:59:19
  • #2
Don’t make fun. Sometimes you have to write exaggeratedly for the intention to come across. I also added a detailed assessment and didn’t just laugh at you. You want to outsource the risk for a special property to the bank. That doesn’t work. You have to put up a lot of money in advance. And still have money in reserve, because unforeseen events are guaranteed to happen.
 

RomeoZwo

2020-07-27 11:17:29
  • #3
A conversation with an architect two weeks ago resulted in at least €2,500 if it is to be completely renovated and meet "new building standards." In my case, it is not even a half-timbered house, but a normal brick house with historic monument protection and built around 1920. Renovation costs including incidental expenses are roughly around €300k. By the way, the bank will also agree to financing, but only if detailed plans from an architect with cost calculations prepared by the architect are provided beforehand. For this planning (everything necessary for the monument office and building application, grants, KfW) the architect charges about €9k. If the property/existing house were not in equity, I would not do it. This results in an "advantage" compared to a newly marketed semi-detached house about 100m away with a significantly smaller garden of about €100-150k.
 

nordanney

2020-07-27 11:23:10
  • #4
: The original poster will realize that as well, even if he does not want to renovate so extensively (and not under monument protection). But you will also receive a nice subsidy then.
 

haydee

2020-07-27 11:28:54
  • #5
I'll give my two cents as a former owner of [Fachwerk] and outbuildings like a barn and stable
 

11ant

2020-07-27 11:34:58
  • #6
"Collector's item" practically means that it is only suitable for a clientele who have the money and can afford to write it off as a flop. Indisputable ceiling height, timber framing on a vaulted cellar, change of use, a "grown" colorful ensemble of outbuildings: at least in total these are contraindications – at least for those not experienced (in severe cases) in renovation. In my assessment, this is clearly not a case for beginners; you can only get hurt. Overall, I would rather describe the property as contaminated than as developed (in my case just a personal opinion, but as a board member of a bank I would hardly think differently).
 

Similar topics
21.07.2013Cost estimates from two architects differ greatly!10
29.10.2013Property reserved, construction financing plan, architect/building permit application21
16.12.2013Pre-planning with the architect - is having your own floor plan sensible?18
08.01.2014Opinions on the hillside property22
09.04.2014Questions/neglected plot/meadow, determining construction measures44
21.08.2014Construction costs when building with architects. What does your experience say?18
11.02.2015Cost planning for a single-family house including land, additional costs, architect32
19.12.2014Finding architects - but how?26
05.04.2015Property reserved. Financing is pending52
08.09.2015Massive house by the architect, approximate costs?16
29.10.2015Is it normal for the purchase of land to be tied to an architect?16
19.01.2016Construction project with architects31
08.01.2016House placement on a small 448m² plot56
10.04.2016divide a long, narrow plot12
12.07.2016House construction on narrow land? 3-family house already exists56
18.02.2017Assessment of the buildability of a large plot according to §3417
12.01.2018Plan the house first and only then buy the land?79
07.02.2018Architect's suggestions disappointing - What next?32
16.03.2018Old building on property - Bungalow extension - Various problems10
15.08.2018Basic floor area ratio / floor area ratio for plots without a development plan: How to calculate? Experiences?18

Oben