In the meantime, I have the land register and we are going into negotiations this week, so here is a question:
The property consists of two parcels, one of which, making up about half of the total area, is designated as agricultural land and the other as open or residential land. I wanted to orient myself towards the standard land value in the negotiations regarding the land price, but now the question arises whether I should really consider the full standard land value for the second parcel based on the entry in the land register. From the perspective of a financing advisor who recently advised us, he would base it on this and only value half the property at the standard land value and the rest at a significantly lower value. The background is also that building is only possible on one parcel (according to the building envelope). Otherwise, he estimates the price resulting from standard land value x land area to be too high.
What is your opinion, or how would you approach this?
Thank you!