Passive house as a logical consequence? Are there counterarguments?

Moreover, for a standard Energy Saving Ordinance house, you do not get program 153 , so the savings are indeed given compared to that.

No, but with Kfw 70, as I wrote! And there the manageable investments still pay off... whereas from Kfw 70 on it no longer pays off.

But whatever... in a few months the info is probably no longer up to date anyway

As always, with the energy topic everyone says from all sides "it doesn't pay off." How do the more expensive tiles pay off? How does a fireplace pay off? How does building a single-family house pay off at all?

At 2%, everything pays off

Hehe, you can fudge the numbers however you want... but the fact is: you have to put more money in upfront... ergo, you also have to pay back more on the back end...

And then you generally can't make special repayments on the KfW loans, meaning you're stuck with them for 30 years...

And the construction expert is right, 40% additional costs are realistic... 2%, I don’t think so...

40% additional costs are absurd. Or do you actually all build for 1300€/sqm?

LOL I even built for €1400 per sqm, namely a KfW-70 house... and I wouldn't really go below that... unless you plan to end up with the [Baurettern] later...

If you really have cheap offers - whether for PH or normal, take a close look at what you are getting... not that cheap = low quality.

Good morning,

40% additional costs are absurd. Or do you really all build for €1300/sqm?

Why?

Or do you think I made up the number because I enjoy fooling you and the users here? Maybe you should describe what you understand by a PH, then we might get closer to the matter.

Rhenish greetings