The idea with the glass towards the oldtimer had already crossed my mind.
Seriously. I have attached the plan of the property and the excerpt from the development plan with height information. The property slopes down to the back left (when you’re basically standing in front of the house) and the granny flat is almost exclusively on this side. The excerpt from the development plan faces north, the picture of the reconstructed property does not.
Regarding the garages, we want to be able to reach everything on one level, i.e. drive the car into the garage and then into the house on the same level. There is 8 meters of space in front of the garage lengthwise, so you can easily park there if that’s what you meant 11ant.
Furthermore, only with a large garage can we reach the maximum 30 kWp photovoltaic system. It is planned to eventually replace one of the two cars with an electric car (probably the girlfriend’s car).
However, I have thought about the garage again, maybe one of the two could be sunk into the ground behind the house, I have to check if that’s possible and practical.
Und nach meinem Eindruck setzt sich im gesamten Plan eine ungelenke Maß- und Massenverteilung fort.
That’s why I’m posting this here. We are obviously not architects and do not want to build a 120 m² house anyway. We could probably save a little space upstairs, but then we would cut into the ground floor and also the basement with the granny flat. It’s not like we put the floor plan together in an hour and are now saying, please improve it. It cost us HOURS of work...
Best regards Martin