When I built back in 2014, KFW55 would have cost me about 12-16 thousand euros more.
Let’s deduct about 8 thousand euros for underfloor heating, which I didn’t want and never want to have.
My problem in "", or rather the preferences of my wife and me regarding heating.
For say 8 thousand more, it wasn’t worth it to me or the bank to finance the additional effort, which would have mainly been in the foundation slab and groundwork (my KFW70 is almost a KFW55, very close).
The Energy Saving Ordinance 100 (KFW70) costs about 10-15 euros/month more in direct heating consumption compared to 55.
Even with a KFW70/Energy Saving Ordinance 100, on about 130sqm including heating and hot water, you’re already at (whether gas or air-water heat pump) 50/month. The margin to save is getting slimmer and slimmer.
Only: If I had already known then that KFW70 is a phased-out model and would become the standard in 2016, I would very likely have built KFW55 solely for market/resale value reasons.
Today I would therefore build KFW55, it currently seems the most sensible to me. KFW40 and 40+ are amazing, but enormously expensive.
You can quickly end up 10-30 thousand euros higher here than with KFW55.
Best regards
Thorsten