ypg
2016-11-10 12:05:50
- #1
So, I have now looked at the draft again calmly. The dressing room, which only has a wardrobe space of 3 meters, also caught my attention.... delete the word "only", replace with "not even": 3.05 as a raw construction dimension is not enough, minus plaster and baseboards we are at 2.95. A standard wardrobe does not fit there.
However, the measurements can also already be net dimensions: the draft was made with the program that both I and kbt have. At least for me, the area calculation _inkl.Putz_ is displayed. Further: The bathroom is missing the pre-wall installations. This makes the displayed fittings between washbasin and shower unsatisfyingly tight.
I think it is completely okay that children initially live on the parents’ level in smaller rooms. But it is the case that because of this, the entire basement has to be designed as a living basement. I am confused by the modern character of the open living area (not only upward, but fundamentally), in contrast to the very conservative basic idea of the house, to use the basement almost only as utility space and locate living rooms on the ground floor as an apartment.
Either the creative planner was given a conservative preliminary plan from the client, or there were ideas from the client with openness etc., but the planner is a conservative. It’s a pity, here Split-Level screams, but the money is rather wasted on utility rooms over 20 sqm.
Have a crisis meeting tonight until Sunday, that’s my tip!
Regards
However, the measurements can also already be net dimensions: the draft was made with the program that both I and kbt have. At least for me, the area calculation _inkl.Putz_ is displayed. Further: The bathroom is missing the pre-wall installations. This makes the displayed fittings between washbasin and shower unsatisfyingly tight.
I think it is completely okay that children initially live on the parents’ level in smaller rooms. But it is the case that because of this, the entire basement has to be designed as a living basement. I am confused by the modern character of the open living area (not only upward, but fundamentally), in contrast to the very conservative basic idea of the house, to use the basement almost only as utility space and locate living rooms on the ground floor as an apartment.
Either the creative planner was given a conservative preliminary plan from the client, or there were ideas from the client with openness etc., but the planner is a conservative. It’s a pity, here Split-Level screams, but the money is rather wasted on utility rooms over 20 sqm.
Have a crisis meeting tonight until Sunday, that’s my tip!
Regards