New construction of a single-family house or multi-family house in the southwest

I meant rather to enlarge the bathrooms. They really seem small by comparison. true. Today we have an adjusted design with quite a few changes. The bathroom in the middle on the upper floor is a children's bathroom.

[QUOTE="hampshire, post: 457732, member: 46205"] It always surprises me how small living room furniture people want to sit with their backs to the windows. Here twice in a row. The spaciousness of the "living area" stands in a strange relation to the rather tight dining area. Also, the bathrooms are very compact relative to the house size. I think the idea of a second staircase is great. However, the position of the spiral staircase causes a cramped dining area and a dead corner on the ground floor. Somehow not really elegant. It wouldn't be mine – although I can quite appreciate extraordinary designs. Lack of spatial economy is not a problem if you can be generous with the construction costs. But if the lack of spatial economy does not serve to create spaciousness in living or aesthetic purposes, it's a shame. we also overhauled this, see pictures. The design lacks the "spark" that one could expect from a house with a similar budget. "Different" and "good" is valuable. Just "different" wastes money.

Distill readable plans from the hidden object pictures.

no, just look at the new draft. The topic of the master bedroom has been revised there.