Is the knee wall too low? What does the measurement refer to?

  • Erstellt am 2018-01-09 20:59:32

ypg

2018-01-10 12:38:50
  • #1


It is binding if it is stated as such, namely as RBM in the contract.
A good general contractor will then inform you about the deductions -> screed, floor covering, and ceiling cladding, but also the rafter position.

The clarification distinguishes a good general contractor from a "not so good" one.
 

baumann42

2018-01-10 13:27:37
  • #2
binding? actually yes, the bricklayer should certainly be able to read the construction drawing!! there is certainly also a concrete frame, it should then have the correct height.
 

kbt09

2018-01-10 13:36:37
  • #3


No .. see the red crossed lines, it’s only about the knee wall measurement inside.



No .. for the drawing the finished measurement would be 125 - approx. 20 cm floor construction = 105 cm

That much time must be spent .
 

Knallkörper

2018-01-10 14:41:45
  • #4
You are right. Now I was mistaken after all, I wrongly assumed 1.50m, correctly wrote 1.25m. Then it is around 1.10m with 12cm screed construction and 3cm covering.

The 1.50m refers, in my opinion, to the height in the corner. The line is not drawn correctly. On the other side, the dimension lines are also covered by the dotted lines.

Anyway, I believe there is no doubt that the drawing is clear.
 

11ant

2018-01-10 15:17:11
  • #5
Correct for what purpose: a price reduction, even if no problem arises from it? Be glad if you don’t have to stretch to be able to look out the window. About 125 cm is usually an ideal effective knee wall, and now you have it.

Oh, shouldn’t that have been clarified before signing?

I read the drawing so that the wall and ring beam make up the 125 cm and with the foot purlin added, then 150 cm results, each measured from the top edge of the raw floor.

According to the drawing, the distance from the top edge of the raw floor to the top edge of the foot purlin is 150 cm. So one meter fifty is stated there, but for a dimension that is actually not user-oriented.
 

305er

2018-01-10 20:01:05
  • #6
Well, I still see it a bit differently.

This weirdly dashed line that runs diagonally and goes over the door, no idea what that's supposed to be.
Definitely nothing to do with the ceiling, otherwise it would only go just above the door, which it doesn't.
Therefore, the 150 still goes up to the bend of the drywall panels.

125cm seems way too small to me, not for nothing we actually wanted 150 cm, also the loft bed we bought at 140 no longer fits underneath.

And why stretch from the window? We have floor-to-ceiling windows

Yes, right for the purpose, if it is like that, to get a discount, nothing else works.

Before signing...Hm...Yes, but if you get lied to about everything, it doesn't help either.

The 125 wall was correct, I believe the 150 was too once
 

Similar topics
27.02.2015Burglary-proof windows?33
03.06.2014Interior design - windows14
18.06.2014Inspector defect identification, determination of window installation10
18.05.2016Help needed with window arrangement!32
27.05.2015Huge problem with condensation on the window34
20.12.2019Trefz window prices and experiences?14
26.01.2015Window between two rooms13
13.03.2015Opinions on window parapet height sought30
22.04.2015Window, roller shutter, exterior plaster10
28.05.2015Round window - dissatisfied with the interior reveal16
27.05.2015Which roller shutters with a closed window, only glazing?13
15.10.2015Kitchen planning with deep windows43
26.11.2015Floor-level shower with nearby window13
12.11.2017Minimum width for a 2-wing window/terrace door?48
10.12.2015Proper drying / tilting the window?24
22.02.2016Terrace door / sliding door / floor-to-ceiling windows13
03.07.2016U-value of windows - differences15
30.06.2016Is forced release of roller shutters on a window mandatory?41
15.10.2016Renovation of children's room - split one window into two windows?20
21.11.2018Switch for roller shutters on the window or on the door?38

Oben