Initial Floor Plan - Backyard Development - 1.5 Stories

I have spoken with many people who do not want to miss the conservatory

Because your house does not offer something they are looking for. In our case, the older generation still has their conservatories, which were considered mainstream and a must-have in the 1980s. Ultimately, there are furniture pieces there that are stored elsewhere in the party basement, and garden cushions are stored there as well.

I would expect from it that you have a bright room to linger in throughout the whole year and to look into the garden/distance.

Just design the rooms bright and airy, then you will also enjoy spending time there.

Giving the dressing room enough space to comfortably dress in it. The space between the wardrobes is far too narrow for that.

With a width of 250, it is wide enough to hop around on one leg and then bend over widely to take off your pants, standing between two wardrobes opposite each other.

PS: I am sleep-deprived and only partially coherent.

Sleep deprivation does not take away your perception: I also do not like the foyer, open room, and living room in terms of layout and daylight.

With a width of 250, it is wide enough to hop around on one leg, then bend down extensively to take off your pants, positioned between two wardrobes opposite each other.

A wonderful image, and I would agree with you if there were no wardrobes in the way. With a depth of 50, there is still 1.50 left. If you open a wardrobe door, you only have 1m at that spot, and if on the other side a drawer or also a door is opened, you have 50cm. And if you want to see yourself completely in the mirror, you also have no distance, because on the long side where that would be possible there are windows and a door. We have the wardrobe as a room divider between the head end of the bed and the entrance to the bathroom. There is about 1.5m of space in front of it. That is great for taking things out and putting them away, but I wouldn’t plan it as a dressing area. We laugh today about the small kitchens of houses from the 60s to 80s, which are now considered nonfunctional. The same will be true for the much too small dressing rooms and pantries in a few years. These rooms are luxury and cost extra square meters. In a tightly dimensioned house, I consider these rooms a priority to be questioned, as they take up too much space while fulfilling their function too little.

A wonderful picture and I would also agree with you if no cabinets were put in. With a depth of 50, there remains 1.50.

But... I have been doing this for too long. Sorry. In such rooms, firstly, you don’t plan for hinged doors; secondly, 1.20 fits very well with 60 deep cabinets. Many plan for 180... I am also critical of that. But criticism has its limits.

Do you open a cabinet door,

-

These rooms are luxury and cost extra square meters. In a tightly dimensioned house

Fortunately, it’s not tight here :)