Heating type for new construction - Which is the best?

  • Erstellt am 2017-10-07 20:33:41

R.Hotzenplotz

2017-10-26 15:18:56
  • #1
I have new information. The air heat pump is supposed to cost € 8,000 more than the ground heat pump. Therefore, a ground collector solution is now recommended instead. That is supposed to be roughly the same price as the ground heat pump and include the same device, if I understood correctly.
 

ruppsn

2017-10-26 17:28:54
  • #2
The air-to-water heat pump solution as a whole or just the device? At least the latter would be confusing in terms of clarity.
 

Alex85

2017-10-26 17:34:27
  • #3


To add, these incorrectly planned systems will not be subsidized by BAFA because the proof of the necessary seasonal performance factor will fail.
 

Alex85

2017-10-26 18:14:52
  • #4


If he does not perform a room-by-room heating load calculation as a planning basis, he has no clue. Because without this it is impossible to correctly select the dimensioning of the heat pump. This in turn leads to too high acquisition costs and uneconomical operation. Furthermore, the mentioned specimen exposes himself by the statement that it would then run constantly at full load. joedreck has already written enough about this.



Of course, assumptions are made in forums. If the OP does not reveal that he has restrictions that prevent deeper drilling, one is surprised about the stated price. Otherwise, you should rather ask yourself what you want to expect from forums and whether this can be a suitable source of information for you. You intend to buy a heating system worth 25-35K€ (in your sums more likely the latter), but you yourself have no clue and you do not want to trust the free sources (such as this forum). Then the only option is to spend more money to have the first service provider checked by the second.



Then just read elsewhere. Buffer tanks for heat pumps are nonsense. First, there is already a huge buffer in the form of underfloor heating and hot water storage tanks. Second, a heat pump only works efficiently at low temperatures; hot water preparation (45°C, sometimes higher (bad!)) is therefore not its strength. Therefore, keeping a lot of hot water makes no sense.



No words. Where do you live?! No one owes you an explanation. You consume here because you yourself have no clue and reluctantly want to do research yourself. Take the free help or not, but drop your demands.



FEEAAAR!! And how much is this guarantee worth? Conduct a survey here on how long it takes a new building resident to notice that his heating has failed at all. Perhaps the wooden house resident notices it due to lack of storage mass, who builds massive needs many, many hours until it becomes noticeable at all.



You can also buy them isolated on the internet. Costs about 200€. Some do it themselves as well.



Reasonable plans can be recognized by comprehensible planning approaches. Sentences like "always done that way," "that’s fine," or "better a bit more" reveal that no planning took place. A leads to B leads to C. If the HB can only name C without describing the path to it, he did not plan but guessed. Just ask why the heat pump should be 12kW, like Hotzenplotz. If you only get "yes, it has to be so for the house size," then he disqualifies himself.



This is getting better and better. 8K€ extra. Yes, an air-water heat pump, i.e. just the device, is more expensive because the outdoor unit is included, 1-2K€. Then a little for the pedestal on which the outdoor unit stands. Total 8K€? No way. That much costs the entire heat pump (online price, admittedly)!

Whether drilling or ground collector is completely irrelevant for the heat pump. Exactly the same device, only a different heat source.
 

R.Hotzenplotz

2017-10-26 18:26:10
  • #5


Just the device. By eliminating the drilling, that more than compensates, so that overall I would be better off with it.




They now want to examine the solution with ground collectors. I said I am skeptical because I still want to build a swimming pool in the garden later and also plant a large tree. She said they had planned the front side of the property in front of the house for that anyway. Apparently then under the garage driveway etc. – there they dig 1.5m deep.

But what is the point if the ground itself is borderline for a ground heating system even at 100m depth? They say the concept is different. But I don’t understand that.
 

Alex85

2017-10-26 18:45:01
  • #6
The flat collector lies close beneath the surface. And it needs really, really a lot of area, don’t let anyone tell you otherwise! It also has some other possible disadvantages, just Google it.
Alternatively trench collector, needs less area.
Both are eligible for funding, a bit less than a borehole.



Besides the completely crazy 30,000€ for a geothermal drilling, you should be glad that the air-water heat pump is only offered at double the price. Unbelievable.

I just read your other thread with the 4000€ forced inspector.

When will your limit actually be reached?
 

Similar topics
27.10.2013Geothermal heat pump maintenance: what to watch for and how22
12.01.2012Geothermal heat pump, solar, and fireplace as heating?15
09.05.2015Ground source heat pump vs. air source heat pump24
30.12.2016Geothermal heat pump with controlled living space ventilation or without18
11.07.2018Economic efficiency of geothermal heat pump10
16.04.2020Massive or wood / Drilling or trench collector35
27.09.2020Sound insulation of geothermal heat pump in the technical room17
10.04.2021Geothermal heat pump for a small single-story single-family house15
16.06.2021Seal underground drilling14
01.01.2022Geothermal heat pump or gas boiler - experiences?17
01.08.2022How much space does the geothermal drilling require?11
22.03.2023Expand ground source heat pump to heat a small indoor pool18
18.06.2023Height of the base of the outdoor unit heat pump10

Oben