I have to completely disagree. We always adhere to the development plan and also have all the permits for buildings etc.
I didn’t say that you didn’t stick to it, sometimes you also misinterpret it or overlook something.
For example, I have now taken another look at our development plan. I am actually capable of reading laws, but despite reading it several times, I can’t tell you how many trees and shrubs we should really have planted. In our rear part of the property (edge area), a tree must be planted every 10 m or 100 m² according to the species list. Additionally, 1 shrub every 4 m². That would probably be 2 trees for 17.5 m width. The depth of this area is not precisely defined, so it can only be roughly estimated. You can imagine how exactly measuring works on a 25,000 m² construction site on A3 paper.
Furthermore, for all properties, one ridge-transcending tree or a fruit tree must be planted for every 300 m² of property size. For just over 500 m² of property area, in my opinion, that would be one tree. Whether the trees from both areas are offset against each other or must be cumulatively planted, or whether the m² from the rear edge area is deducted from the rest of the property and thus we come under 300 m² remaining area… honestly, I don’t know. Then trees are required according to the species list. Above the species list, however, it says among other things (presumably for among others), which actually once again leaves the door wide open for free choice. Even if we had fulfilled the number and type of trees, I would never claim that we had fulfilled the development plan 100%. It’s simply too vague for that.
I can’t see any violations of rules by our neighbors so far either.
Then how do you come to the conclusion that the neighbors might not have read the development plan?
I also wonder whether the 5 builders in our street have even read the development plan. Most probably don’t care. Not everyone is as crazy as some here (including me).