11ant
2024-02-10 23:17:07
- #1
We have 5 new buildings on the street. Our development plan states that in the rear part of the , traditional orchard meadows are mandatory. For each of the plots, the number and size of the fruit trees to be planted are specified in detail. The builders have 1 year to carry out the plantings.
Instead of the 9 fruit trees, a pool is being built. That’s quite a difference, I would say.
And not only I would agree. Probably also the building authority employee, who has completed a special training course to operate the control photo drone.
Personally, I would honestly measure with double standards here: if the rule violator is part of the village community and otherwise contributes to the pleasant living there, then I would address him at the shop after the choir rehearsal about which little trees he chose and how well they took. On the other hand, if it is someone who considers rule compliance to be narrow-minded nonsense and strictly lives by the motto "Bosses don’t signal before turning," then I would probably help him come to his senses. Because as you already hinted with ...
On the other hand, I am already annoyed by the first garden of horrors that is just being created, where the actual orchard meadow is being dug up for a mega pool with a terrace.
... the pool could only be the tip of the iceberg, and soon a floodlight system in the gravel front yard will illuminate the gold chain villa. Such people need headwind, in the sense of Wolfgang Grupp's "as long as the problem is still small."