Floor plan single-family house - Your assessment

What I like:

[*
generous children's rooms
[*]wooden veranda in front of the front door
[*]sewing room - nice when hobbies are considered (also plan space for a piano)


What I don't like:


[*]cramped living area
[LIST]
[*]too small for 4 people
[*]uncommunicative - everything oriented towards one screen
[*]location in the narrow passage area to the terrace


[*]closed-off living space


[*]only one door to the outside
[*]positioning of the windows in relation to where people stay


[*]narrow kitchen


[*]work surfaces in the corner areas are hardly usable based on experience
[*]little freedom of movement
[*]passages too narrow


[*]narrow staircase


[*]a torture when transporting larger items (bed, furniture)


[*]narrow hallway on the upper floor


[*]reminds me of hallways in English terraced houses for workers from the industrial era. I wouldn’t choose that and you do when you build.


[*]unsuitable place for home office work


[*]it’s hot, noisy, and cramped there. I’d rather sit at the dining table with a laptop.

What puzzles me:

[*]Where does the preference for narrowness come from?
[*]What is an open space above the wardrobe doing?
[*]Why are drying racks standing next to beds?

I would neither build nor rent this house.

You could

These can easily be resized

In the bathroom could

One could also plan better from the start instead of messing around and patching up.

since it is supposed to serve the following purposes: for guests, as storage space for junk, where the children can possibly set up a train without cluttering their rooms, and as a bedroom in old age when tired bones no longer want to deal with stairs.

The room is supposed to serve many purposes, but the house is not suitable for everyday life.

But if you are generally not a fan of basements,

This is not a basement, this is a dungeon... bunker... it is a hole buried in the ground without light.

if the sentence is too complicated, I can gladly quote the original passages).

Those names you can actively read here know about the clear room height in full stories.
Just take a look at the profile to see how long the user has been giving advice.

and then end up with KS at about 1.64m height.

And now the masons are supposed to cut the bricks to the centimeter? That’s not effective, nor is that how things are done anymore.
Take the round shelf and then a functioning floor plan or architect.

where the clear height of 2.2m is reached. From there I then go with the lowest allowed angle (18°) to the outer wall and end up at the knee wall with about 1.64m height. [...] ??? Sorry, I absolutely can't make sense of the funny sentence. [...] And the room under the slopes is "more dead than alive"? [...] I'll attach a sketch. However, there is little wondrous about it. [...] I want a gable roof, but I have written that I have occasionally seen hip roofs of this kind.

If I understand correctly, you have identified your 2.20m line about 1.72 m away from the outer wall and from there aimed as flat as possible towards the eaves. That is the classic layman’s cleverness that optimizes the knee wall at the expense of the attic space (as you have probably realized yourself). At 30° pitch you would get a 1.20 m knee wall and in the attic after 3.12 m a standing height of 180 (instead of 101 at 18° pitch). I find your freestyle Mexican hat as a roof shape at least just wondrous and apart from church towers have indeed never seen it before; your development plan will most likely simply and dryly say "njet" — however, the roof structure would (on)cost even more than the Pyrrhic basement.

Really?

As said, understanding your very special train of thought assumed, gladly.

I will take another closer look at proven floor plans.

That sounds like a good plan. Better practically functioning than (unfortunately only) theoretically brilliant.