Julloef
2024-05-07 08:21:41
- #1
Referred to what?
You achieved that with just under 200 sqm. Without incidental building costs or ancillary facilities.
Do you have a second floor area ratio for ancillary facilities? If not, then you are allowed to build 170 sqm.
The house is just under 130 sqm. That leaves 40 sqm for terrace, paths, and parking spaces.
About the design itself: there are already some big blunders in it. Bottleneck next to the staircase landing, guest WC too small for this furnishing, kitchen not functioning due to lack of workspace or storage. For that, the TV distance to the sofa is over 5 meters.
Upstairs it doesn’t work at all with what you have drawn. You split the long 13 meter wall for bathroom and bedroom with dressing area.
And the exterior views frankly don’t make sense either. Floor-to-ceiling windows are nice, window bands are nice – but you don’t have to plaster everything over or overdo it. Especially because you should also use gables. By the way, a house should smile at the front if you look at the facade with imagination. What expression do you see in the east?
The three window bands next to each other look totally negative… they are just three minus signs…
If the neighbor gets too close because the plot is small, at least balustrades upstairs should provide privacy.
What I want to praise, however, is the old school variant with which you drew. It has advantages, namely concentrating on the design and not on foreign software. And you dare to erase.
I tried again to incorporate the criticism.
What I still do not like:
- Living room corner too small
- Bathroom on the ground floor without a window, unless I build a carport
- Utility room too small
- Feels like too little storage on the ground floor