wpic
2015-11-27 09:52:22
- #1
In my opinion, these floor plans are not yet ready for construction, as they are not conclusive. On the ground floor, a lot of circulation space is planned, including an anteroom/airlock to the garage. The staircase has 19 steps, which would only be justified with a clear room height of 3.00 m. I do not see this room height in the elevations. The stairwell is also very long. The bay window extension in the living/dining room complicates and possibly increases the cost of the floor plan if the basement floor plan does not match it. The children on the upper floor really do not need a balcony; if anything, the parents should have one in connection with the bedroom. I find the garage too large, also in comparison to the house.
The bathroom on the upper floor is, of course, generously sized; whether it really still needs to be almost 13 m2 after furnishing the bathroom remains to be seen. The storage room also seems more like a leftover space and is poorly usable in terms of proportions. The door arrangement in the bedroom, together with the flush-mounted window, makes building a large wardrobe impossible. Here, the door would at least have to be shifted towards the bathroom.
Kitchen/ground floor, WC/ground floor and bathroom/upper floor are located in three different places, which complicates and increases the cost of the installation routing.
I would not commit to the building type "town villa." The term is associated with certain ideas about the building body and its proportions (square base plan; hipped roof, bay window, etc.), which can also be impractical in the respective building situation. Perhaps your room program fits much better into a free floor plan, from which a building form develops that is initially not fixed. This is the architect's job and is called preliminary design/design (work phases 1-3).
And: The house should also be an expression of individual living and lifestyle. For the construction cost, I would want to build a more interesting house with an architectural statement. You should fundamentally reconsider your building project and approach the design more freely. In addition, compliance with building and planning law ([Bebauungsplan]) must of course be guaranteed.
The bathroom on the upper floor is, of course, generously sized; whether it really still needs to be almost 13 m2 after furnishing the bathroom remains to be seen. The storage room also seems more like a leftover space and is poorly usable in terms of proportions. The door arrangement in the bedroom, together with the flush-mounted window, makes building a large wardrobe impossible. Here, the door would at least have to be shifted towards the bathroom.
Kitchen/ground floor, WC/ground floor and bathroom/upper floor are located in three different places, which complicates and increases the cost of the installation routing.
I would not commit to the building type "town villa." The term is associated with certain ideas about the building body and its proportions (square base plan; hipped roof, bay window, etc.), which can also be impractical in the respective building situation. Perhaps your room program fits much better into a free floor plan, from which a building form develops that is initially not fixed. This is the architect's job and is called preliminary design/design (work phases 1-3).
And: The house should also be an expression of individual living and lifestyle. For the construction cost, I would want to build a more interesting house with an architectural statement. You should fundamentally reconsider your building project and approach the design more freely. In addition, compliance with building and planning law ([Bebauungsplan]) must of course be guaranteed.