Floor plan and extension of a house - Year built 1966

  • Erstellt am 2023-02-13 10:46:08

kati1337

2023-02-13 17:06:35
  • #1


I agree. As I said, even with our concrete ceiling, we had to pay extra to get rid of a support post and achieve such a large open space. Honestly, I can't imagine that this can really be done with a wooden ceiling.
 

Schorsch_baut

2023-02-13 17:11:40
  • #2
Sure, but then you might have a > 30 cm high KVH beam as a support beam or its counterpart in steel. Both then require corresponding bearings. And I suspect that more than one support beam is needed so that the ceiling does not swing too much. But that is just my layman's opinion. For such an ambitious renovation, I would consult an architect very early on before letting all the dreams grow too much only to bury them later.
 

SoL

2023-02-13 17:14:25
  • #3
Asked from a different perspective: What do you see as worth preserving about the house and why?
Put differently: Is it just a passion project or can it simply be done away with?
 

alles3d

2023-02-13 17:28:06
  • #4

The floor plan fits our workflows very well. My wife is involved :). We save part of the demolition. There is more KFW funding available for renovation than for new construction. Even as a new build, I can imagine implementing this floor plan as it is. Can this be built as a new build at a comparable price?

Then a concrete ceiling might be more sensible. Probably not a big cost difference.
 

kati1337

2023-02-13 17:34:45
  • #5
I honestly don't believe that you can renovate it for 400k, nor that you can build it new for that amount. I assumed the 400k in the original post were purely the renovation costs and that the purchase costs for the property are already excluded, right?
 

SoL

2023-02-13 17:34:57
  • #6
I am known for speaking uncomfortable truths: I consider the renovation for 400k a pipe dream. You are practically building new. You are only using the old (presumably uninsulated ground slab) and the old (technically catastrophic in terms of insulation) exterior walls. Everything future has to conform to the walls. You are not saving anything there.

Upstairs you are adding another floor, a new roof, outside you are putting every conceivable expensive climate gadget on the house that you once saw on Instagram.

I see this as neither a new build nor a "renovation" for 400k.
 

Similar topics
16.05.2014What makes a new building expensive?20
08.05.2016Renovation & Attic Expansion: KfW? Cost-effectiveness vs. New Construction?18
23.03.2018House from the 1930s. Renovate or rebuild?25
02.10.20183-FH planned without basement, your feedback on my floor plan48
15.04.2020Unrenovated single-family house from 1973 - Renovation or new construction?32
02.09.2020Old building or new building?55
15.09.2020New single-family house or core renovation of a house built in 197839
13.01.2021Cost estimation for demolition and new construction75
05.02.2021Is renovating old buildings worthwhile?42
28.03.2021Flat rate cost for house renovation - what is realistic?15
08.09.2021Floor plan feedback: Semi-detached house for a 4-person family, self-designed24
01.09.2022Demolition of 270-year-old house & construction of modern multifunctional building23
30.01.2022Demolition and reconstruction or renovation?33
23.01.2023Financing single-family house purchase price 365k, additional construction costs 150k, renovation?28
31.01.2023House purchase built in 1995 vs. new construction long-term cost calculation35
10.04.2023Renovate an old building or build new? Experiences?35
09.05.2024Floor plan ideas for a detached single-family house as an extension with 3 children's rooms and an office35
15.06.2024When is it worthwhile to demolish an old building for a new construction?11
26.08.2024Buy a house with electric heating? Or a new terraced house?30
30.08.2024Renovation or demolition and new construction - decision support from the architect?25

Oben