I would seriously doubt that. Most modern switches/routers wouldn't even recognize such a cable.
Why is that? 100Base-T only requires two pairs of wires. Anyone who claims to support this standard can do that. Whether the quality of the cable is sufficient can be found out through testing. Of course, there's nothing original about that, but putting a network socket on both ends and testing it is no big deal.
Ok, however, 100Base-TX is not exactly something I would expect in a new building. Especially since the solution with the router in the [Hauswirtschaftsraum] actually only has advantages.
I don't really care whether you tolerate botched work or not. I was just pointing out how it can still be saved
Willo, your suggestion with the router in the utility room, laying access points if necessary, is not dead, I just want to try first if it might still work with the Cat 4 cable. If yes, that's good, if not, willo.
Ok, however, 100Base-TX is not exactly something I would expect in a new building. Especially since the solution with the router in the utility room actually only has advantages.
I understand. But it only has four wires and only 50 MBit booked from outside, so the 100 MBit network segment is sufficient. Sure, Karsten's FTTH connection can already do 200 MBit today, then he would have a bottleneck. But I believe before Karsten books this product, he first has to transfer the connection into the [Eichenkiste]. In that respect, that fits.