Feedback on property selection

  • Erstellt am 2019-05-11 17:43:27

kaho674

2019-05-12 10:10:32
  • #1
F2.1 is even smaller. Besides, E5 puts me off a bit. That looks big. What exactly is that again? Don’t you want a garden? Then it can also be F1.6. With plots between 300 and 400 sqm you have to be aware that you almost only have house and paths – hardly any trees – only bonsai. You can also place the house on the south border with a north-facing plot and then instead of a large terrace just make an exit and build a pavilion in the middle of the garden. With narrow plots, you will have to reckon with neighbors building right up to the edge anyway. The smaller, the closer they are. If that bothers you, you can’t buy anything here.
 

ypg

2019-05-12 10:42:38
  • #2
If that's how it is with you, then that's how it is. I find that unusual and am not familiar with it. Just because I assumed differently, which is regulated for you and stated in black and white, you don't have to be confused.
 

-SCEPS-

2019-05-12 12:26:32
  • #3
In theory, a 450 m² plot in another building area could also be considered. But this is located right in the middle of LPB III. To the north, LPB IV is about 30 meters and LPB V about 50 meters away. Since the entire new development is situated in the middle of forest and fields, we do not want to compromise with this type of noise (country road and freight train tracks about 1 km away). Inside the house (with controlled residential ventilation), you would certainly notice little of it, but in the garden, you would.

About the size of F1.4-6.

A developer is building a townhouse with three units in the northern building window and a semi-detached house in the southern building window at that elevation, each plus a penthouse floor (balcony, however, facing southwest). The houses have about an 11-meter east garden, then an 11-meter green strip, and then the 10-11 meter garden of F2.1.

Around 400 m² is fine... you also have to maintain the garden (later).

Not meant that way at all.
It’s not clarified yet. We also wondered whether the supply lines have to be laid 15-20 meters from the south.
 

-SCEPS-

2019-05-12 21:14:22
  • #4
So, we went to the new development area again today. The theoretical plot in LPB III is definitely out. The noise was clearly audible and would not satisfy us given the surroundings.

Otherwise, here are a few pictures:

F2.1: View from the edge of the street at the height of the possible garage driveway towards the west (E5). The plot extends approximately up to the hill.


F2.1: View from the terrace towards the northwest, i.e., to the parking spaces and entrance to the neighborhood.


F3.5: Nice view towards the north. The trees are on the adjacent green strip. View towards the northeast to the fields. Here you can minimally hear the country road 300 meters away (the noise barrier ends at the end of the new development area). Mentally still a bit difficult to assess how to achieve an optimal house/garden placement here.


And then we looked at a similar situation on another construction site as in F1. The gardens in these two rows of houses by one builder are also facing south, only here the access for the southern row (comparable to F1.1-3) is from the north. The distances between the two rows are approx. 17 meters, so comparable to the distance from F1.6 to F1.1+2. That looks quite tight, doesn’t it? OK, there's scaffolding in front, the walls are not yet white plastered, and the semi-detached houses have a recessed top floor. But if I compare that with F1.6, I don’t know if F1.6 is really so great. The neighborhood square in the west loosens it up a bit, and if you’re lucky, then the plots in the southern row don’t have a recessed top floor, but you don’t really know.
 

-SCEPS-

2019-05-12 22:02:24
  • #5
No, why?
 

ypg

2019-05-12 22:08:21
  • #6
There is a slope going up... in front of the embankment... and it slopes down to the left (south?)[ATTACH alt="B0F079D7-93B5-4FC0-AB97-13437729B338.jpeg" type="full"]34476[/ATTACH]

The difference from left to right may be due to your great hip-shot photography, but it goes up towards the back, right?!? oops:
 

Similar topics
09.02.2013What do you think of this property?11
17.12.2013Floor plan single-family house with double garage and terrace19
16.06.2015Take the property or wait and accept the risk?22
05.10.2016House placement on the property, ideas sought23
12.10.2015Plot with some special features - various questions34
15.08.2016Property - Building window - Location of house and garage44
25.07.2016Is a 3,000 sqm plot sensible?44
16.11.2016Broadband supply for the new development area over my property17
07.09.2021Floor plan tube house L-shape triangular plot including oak tree529
04.01.2019Floor planning with a narrowing plot23
18.01.2019Purchase of a semi-detached house with a north-facing garden - which side?10
20.05.2019Property the Second - Please Assess44
27.06.2025Colorful Garden Chat Picture Thread2687
27.06.2019Narrow plot and fencing - assistance13
02.09.2019Detached house, plot with north orientation?28
24.10.2019Single-family house (10x8.8 sqm) on 437 sqm plot in Munich48
02.06.2020New development area - Plot from the municipality18
03.06.20208 trees on the property between the power and telephone lines.31
17.09.2024New development area - sloping plot19
10.05.2025Which property would you choose? Single-family home with double garage44

Oben