Do you have experience with the Cisco SG250X-24P-K9-EU switch?

2020-06-24 16:33:14

Yup, it does here too. But in the new house, the network shouldn't run over multiple different switches.

What does zig mean? If you know it works, take the large switch and that's that. FritzBox -> GS116 or 24 or whatever you need and the topic is settled.

2020-06-24 16:38:04

On the one hand, it is not guaranteed that it will work. There are enough examples that have shown that a model of the same series with more ports might not work. Aside from that, does he (if we are really talking about the same one) have Poe? Does he have L3?

2020-06-24 16:44:56

There are enough examples that have shown that a model from the same series with more ports might not work. I simply cannot imagine that. Perhaps the affected people just did not pay proper attention to the model designation. That can happen with Netgear because many models differ only by one letter, for example GE108 and GS108.

Look at the Smart-Managed (Pro) series, they can do more than you would ever use in private use. They come with 2 POE ports, with 4, with 8, with 16, with SFP, with SFP+, whatever you want.

2020-06-24 23:12:22

Uff.. Cisco is, if you have nothing to do with networking, I think, not the right choice.
I currently also have the Netgear series as 5-port and 8-port. For me, IP TV (Sat to IP converter via Netgear to the server. From you to the media PC over two Netgear) works very well.
However, there are also switches that do not support igmpv3 or do, but it does not work well.
600€ just for a switch in the home area would be too much for me personally, despite the playfulness. You should keep an eye on power consumption.

Regarding double NAT, unfortunately I have it at the moment as well. The Nintendo Switch does not handle it at all, other consoles neither. A separate network helps here (which I have anyway) and no NAT from the device to the 1st router but routing. The first router is taught the IP route. This way you have some control over the devices. But it is different. So far, I have not been motivated to buy a pure modem, as there are always problems with that (depending on the provider), and with my provider, IP telephony does not work so well with the dial-in data you get from them. So I currently have a Fritzbox as router and telephony, behind it an OPnsense firewall.

2020-06-25 00:21:30

Uff.. Cisco is, in my opinion, not the right choice if you have nothing to do with networking. I currently have the Netgear series as a 5-port and 8-port. For me, IPTV (satellite to IP converter over the Netgear to the server. From you to the media PC via two Netgear switches) works very well. However, there are also switches that do not support igmpv3 or do so but it does not work well. 600€ just for a switch in the home area would be too much for me personally, despite the urge to experiment. One should keep an eye on power consumption. Regarding double NAT, unfortunately I currently have that as well. The Nintendo Switch can’t handle it at all, nor can other consoles. A separate network helps here (which I have anyway) and from the device to the first router no NAT but routing. The first router is taught the IP route. That way you have some control over the devices. But it’s different. I have not wanted to buy a pure modem so far because there are always problems with it (depending on the provider, different ones) and with my provider the IP telephony doesn’t work so well over the dial-up data you get from them either. So currently I have a Fritzbox as a router and telephony, behind that an OPNsense firewall.

It’s just not as trivial as some want to make it out to be. With the Cisco switch I would hope for FB-> the rest Switch...

2020-06-25 07:04:41

It's not as trivial as some want to make it seem.
From the Cisco switch, I would expect, FB-> the rest switch...

Yes, it is exactly as trivial as some here portray it. You have already been given the solution with a switch that three people here are happily using (including yourself). You still haven’t answered the question what speaks against this solution and have preferred to go around in circles for 30 posts. If you insist on exactly that one type of Cisco, a homebuilding forum is certainly not the first choice to ask for experience reports.

Similar topics
05.01.2019	Doorbell/intercom system on Fritzbox 7490	16
04.07.2016	WLAN repeater or access point?	25
09.01.2017	Network Technology 2016 for a Single-Family House	63
09.06.2017	Computer cables and Wi-Fi router	43
04.12.2017	Fiber to Home FTTH - WLAN Router, Landline Phone, PC	53
06.10.2017	Which switch do we need?	16
25.02.2019	New construction: Connection & cabling Internet + TV	103
22.02.2019	Home network cabling with POE access points	38
29.02.2020	Implement LAN and SAT in a single-family house with a central server cabinet	40
06.12.2020	Number of network sockets; how to plan Wi-Fi in the new building?	145
04.11.2021	The secure, upscale network in the single-family house	59
22.07.2020	Which switch with POE and 16 or 24 ports	20
03.08.2020	Which router works with Ubiquiti devices?	18
29.08.2021	How do I get WiFi and phone service, technology in the basement	80
01.10.2020	(Smart) door intercom system planning on Fritzbox in new construction	16
23.08.2021	Is one router enough for the whole house?	18
27.10.2021	What is the name of this cable hanging between the sockets now?	11
14.07.2022	Technical room / Router / Access Points / Switches	99
10.01.2023	Which router for our new building?	146
18.02.2023	LAN and Wi-Fi "devices" per floor?	39

Do you have experience with the Cisco SG250X-24P-K9-EU switch?

Ben-man

Tarnari

Ben-man

Teemoe86

Tarnari

Ben-man