Do you have experience with the Cisco SG250X-24P-K9-EU switch?

  • Erstellt am 2020-06-23 18:41:07

Ben-man

2020-06-24 16:33:14
  • #1
What does zig mean? If you know it works, take the large switch and that's that. FritzBox -> GS116 or 24 or whatever you need and the topic is settled.
 

Tarnari

2020-06-24 16:38:04
  • #2
On the one hand, it is not guaranteed that it will work. There are enough examples that have shown that a model of the same series with more ports might not work. Aside from that, does he (if we are really talking about the same one) have Poe? Does he have L3?
 

Ben-man

2020-06-24 16:44:56
  • #3
There are enough examples that have shown that a model from the same series with more ports might not work. I simply cannot imagine that. Perhaps the affected people just did not pay proper attention to the model designation. That can happen with Netgear because many models differ only by one letter, for example GE108 and GS108.

Look at the Smart-Managed (Pro) series, they can do more than you would ever use in private use. They come with 2 POE ports, with 4, with 8, with 16, with SFP, with SFP+, whatever you want.
 

Teemoe86

2020-06-24 23:12:22
  • #4
Uff.. Cisco is, if you have nothing to do with networking, I think, not the right choice.
I currently also have the Netgear series as 5-port and 8-port. For me, IP TV (Sat to IP converter via Netgear to the server. From you to the media PC over two Netgear) works very well.
However, there are also switches that do not support igmpv3 or do, but it does not work well.
600€ just for a switch in the home area would be too much for me personally, despite the playfulness. You should keep an eye on power consumption.

Regarding double NAT, unfortunately I have it at the moment as well. The Nintendo Switch does not handle it at all, other consoles neither. A separate network helps here (which I have anyway) and no NAT from the device to the 1st router but routing. The first router is taught the IP route. This way you have some control over the devices. But it is different. So far, I have not been motivated to buy a pure modem, as there are always problems with that (depending on the provider), and with my provider, IP telephony does not work so well with the dial-in data you get from them. So I currently have a Fritzbox as router and telephony, behind it an OPnsense firewall.
 

Tarnari

2020-06-25 00:21:30
  • #5
It’s just not as trivial as some want to make it out to be. With the Cisco switch I would hope for FB-> the rest Switch...
 

Ben-man

2020-06-25 07:04:41
  • #6

Yes, it is exactly as trivial as some here portray it. You have already been given the solution with a switch that three people here are happily using (including yourself). You still haven’t answered the question what speaks against this solution and have preferred to go around in circles for 30 posts. If you insist on exactly that one type of Cisco, a homebuilding forum is certainly not the first choice to ask for experience reports.
 

Similar topics
06.02.2014Location of Wi-Fi router in the attic?18
05.01.2019Doorbell/intercom system on Fritzbox 749016
03.10.2015Network planning for a 140m2 single-family house15
30.08.2016Commissioning of the network installation76
02.05.2017LAN / WLAN / Telephone - looking for suitable hardware components23
09.06.2017Computer cables and Wi-Fi router43
04.12.2017Fiber to Home FTTH - WLAN Router, Landline Phone, PC53
03.09.2024Is a TAE socket no longer needed?67
29.08.2021How do I get WiFi and phone service, technology in the basement80
14.02.2021Landline telephony in new buildings - what options are available?15
23.08.2021Is one router enough for the whole house?18

Oben