Do you have experience with the Cisco SG250X-24P-K9-EU switch?

2020-06-24 16:33:14

Yup, it does here too. But in the new house, the network shouldn't run over multiple different switches.

What does zig mean? If you know it works, take the large switch and that's that. FritzBox -> GS116 or 24 or whatever you need and the topic is settled.

2020-06-24 16:38:04

On the one hand, it is not guaranteed that it will work. There are enough examples that have shown that a model of the same series with more ports might not work. Aside from that, does he (if we are really talking about the same one) have Poe? Does he have L3?

2020-06-24 16:44:56

There are enough examples that have shown that a model from the same series with more ports might not work. I simply cannot imagine that. Perhaps the affected people just did not pay proper attention to the model designation. That can happen with Netgear because many models differ only by one letter, for example GE108 and GS108.

Look at the Smart-Managed (Pro) series, they can do more than you would ever use in private use. They come with 2 POE ports, with 4, with 8, with 16, with SFP, with SFP+, whatever you want.

2020-06-24 23:12:22

Uff.. Cisco is, if you have nothing to do with networking, I think, not the right choice.
I currently also have the Netgear series as 5-port and 8-port. For me, IP TV (Sat to IP converter via Netgear to the server. From you to the media PC over two Netgear) works very well.
However, there are also switches that do not support igmpv3 or do, but it does not work well.
600€ just for a switch in the home area would be too much for me personally, despite the playfulness. You should keep an eye on power consumption.

Regarding double NAT, unfortunately I have it at the moment as well. The Nintendo Switch does not handle it at all, other consoles neither. A separate network helps here (which I have anyway) and no NAT from the device to the 1st router but routing. The first router is taught the IP route. This way you have some control over the devices. But it is different. So far, I have not been motivated to buy a pure modem, as there are always problems with that (depending on the provider), and with my provider, IP telephony does not work so well with the dial-in data you get from them. So I currently have a Fritzbox as router and telephony, behind it an OPnsense firewall.

2020-06-25 00:21:30

Uff.. Cisco is, in my opinion, not the right choice if you have nothing to do with networking. I currently have the Netgear series as a 5-port and 8-port. For me, IPTV (satellite to IP converter over the Netgear to the server. From you to the media PC via two Netgear switches) works very well. However, there are also switches that do not support igmpv3 or do so but it does not work well. 600€ just for a switch in the home area would be too much for me personally, despite the urge to experiment. One should keep an eye on power consumption. Regarding double NAT, unfortunately I currently have that as well. The Nintendo Switch can’t handle it at all, nor can other consoles. A separate network helps here (which I have anyway) and from the device to the first router no NAT but routing. The first router is taught the IP route. That way you have some control over the devices. But it’s different. I have not wanted to buy a pure modem so far because there are always problems with it (depending on the provider, different ones) and with my provider the IP telephony doesn’t work so well over the dial-up data you get from them either. So currently I have a Fritzbox as a router and telephony, behind that an OPNsense firewall.

It’s just not as trivial as some want to make it out to be. With the Cisco switch I would hope for FB-> the rest Switch...

2020-06-25 07:04:41

It's not as trivial as some want to make it seem.
From the Cisco switch, I would expect, FB-> the rest switch...

Yes, it is exactly as trivial as some here portray it. You have already been given the solution with a switch that three people here are happily using (including yourself). You still haven’t answered the question what speaks against this solution and have preferred to go around in circles for 30 posts. If you insist on exactly that one type of Cisco, a homebuilding forum is certainly not the first choice to ask for experience reports.

Similar topics
06.02.2014	Location of Wi-Fi router in the attic?	18
05.01.2019	Doorbell/intercom system on Fritzbox 7490	16
03.10.2015	Network planning for a 140m2 single-family house	15
30.08.2016	Commissioning of the network installation	76
02.05.2017	LAN / WLAN / Telephone - looking for suitable hardware components	23
09.06.2017	Computer cables and Wi-Fi router	43
04.12.2017	Fiber to Home FTTH - WLAN Router, Landline Phone, PC	53
03.09.2024	Is a TAE socket no longer needed?	67
29.08.2021	How do I get WiFi and phone service, technology in the basement	80
14.02.2021	Landline telephony in new buildings - what options are available?	15
23.08.2021	Is one router enough for the whole house?	18

Do you have experience with the Cisco SG250X-24P-K9-EU switch?

Ben-man

Tarnari

Ben-man

Teemoe86

Tarnari

Ben-man